>Eric Enright wrote:
>
>> Given the option, I'll take gzip over bzip2 without consideration.
>> Waiting a little extra time to receive the archive is far better than
>> waiting a lot of extra time to unpack it.
>>
>
>Exactly.
>Only issue with the gzip binary shipping with Sun Solaris (10 03/05 and
Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michelle Olson wrote:
> > Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
> > I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
> > are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the first to ask.
>
> What about providing both gzip and bzip2
Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct me if I am wrong... the 3K manual page archive for developers
> has nothing todo with Solaris install... right ?
> (And bzip2 on SPARC could be tweaked to run a little bit faster anyway).
>
> I vote to use bzip2 to compress all the developer source
>On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
>
>> I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
>> bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
>> backwards. Really.
>
>I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I discussed this ages ago (I
>forget exactly when); ap
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:37:55AM -0800, Peter Buckingham wrote:
> Stephen Lau wrote:
> >Are you intending to provide any source, or do any open development?
>
> The plan is to provide the SDK initially so that we establish the apis
> that we use for use in other projects (eg. http://www.fedora.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > ken mays wrote:
[snip]
> >> 5. Support for PowerPC G4 to G5 (PPC750GX)
> >
> > Will Apple G3 machines still be supported ?
>
> probably not for a lng time
Why (I still have the chance to get an older Apple G3-based IMac...
question is whether it makes sense to buy i
On 1/29/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Enright wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/29/07, Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Rich,
[snip]
> Waiting a little extra time to receive the archive is far better than
> waiting a lot of
Thanks, Jim. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to get you set up.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Jim Dunham wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the community
two Solaris host-based data services; namely volume snapshot and volume
replica
Eric Enright wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michelle Olson wrote:
> > > Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
> > > I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
> > > are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the first to ask.
> >
A very enthusiastic second!
benr.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 1/29/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michelle Olson wrote:
> Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
> I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
> are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the first to ask.
What about providing both gzip and bzip
On 1/29/07, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Enright wrote:
> Given the option, I'll take gzip over bzip2 without consideration.
> Waiting a little extra time to receive the archive is far better than
> waiting a lot of extra time to unpack it.
>
Exactly.
Only issue with the gzip
Hi Joerg,
Actually, all the pages you were looking for (except sccs.1 and sccs-admin.1)
were delivered in this drop. Prepend 'sccs-' to find them, sccs-cdc.1,
sccs-comb.1, etc. As for sccs.1 we need to do some investigation, for
sccs-admin.1 we think we have the investigation complete. Thanks
> ken mays wrote:
>>
>> What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port?
>> Is the project
>> still active? There were not any status reports or
>> updates in the last
>> months.
>>
>> Bruno
>> -
>>
>> Cyril, PPC for Solaris community lead, can best answer
>
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Eric Enright wrote:
> Given the option, I'll take gzip over bzip2 without consideration.
> Waiting a little extra time to receive the archive is far better than
> waiting a lot of extra time to unpack it.
Amen to that (and I have a reasonably fast 2.6 GHz Opteron CPU here)!
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I discussed this ages ago (I
> > forget exactly when); apparently the use of bzip archives is one
> > reasons why installing Solaris takes so long.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong... the 3K manual page archive for deve
Bruno Jargot wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you. I will ask the
> > gatekeeper to make this change if there are more folks who prefer gzip to
> > bzip2--you are the first to ask.
>
> I think it's better to stic
Stephen Lau wrote:
> Michelle Olson wrote:
> > Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
> > I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
> > are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the
> > first to ask.
>
> My personal preference is for bzip2 - but that's just ca
Michelle Olson wrote:
> Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
> I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
> are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the first to ask.
What about providing both gzip and bzip2 tarballs ?
Bye,
Roland
P.S.: Would it be pos
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> >I vote to use bzip2 to compress all the developer sources... usually the
> >disks are slower than uncompressing the tarball anyway...
>
> Not if the uncompressed archives are bigger than, say, 100MB.
> Try it out on a U60 with 1x300MHz and let's see i
ken mays wrote:
>
> What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port?
> Is the project
> still active? There were not any status reports or
> updates in the last
> months.
>
> Bruno
> -
>
> Cyril, PPC for Solaris community lead, can best answer
> that quest
Eric Enright wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/29/07, Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Rich,
[snip]
> Waiting a little extra time to receive the archive is far better than
> waiting a lot of extra time to unpack it.
Offtopic: Both gzip and bzip
Roland Mainz wrote:
>I vote to use bzip2 to compress all the developer sources... usually the
>disks are slower than uncompressing the tarball anyway...
>
>
>
Not if the uncompressed archives are bigger than, say, 100MB.
Try it out on a U60 with 1x300MHz and let's see if your opinion has change
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Rich Teer wrote:
> >On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
> >
> >>I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
> >>bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
> >>backwards. Really.
> >
> >I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I d
Eric Enright wrote:
> Given the option, I'll take gzip over bzip2 without consideration.
> Waiting a little extra time to receive the archive is far better than
> waiting a lot of extra time to unpack it.
>
Exactly.
Only issue with the gzip binary shipping with Sun Solaris (10 03/05 and
earlier N
Rich Teer wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
> > I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
> > bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
> > backwards. Really.
>
> I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I discussed this ages ago (I
> for
On 1/29/07, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/29/07, Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you. I will ask the
gatekeeper to make this change if there are more folks who prefer gzip to
bzip2--you are the first to as
Rich Teer wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
>
>
>
>>I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
>>bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
>>backwards. Really.
>>
>>
>
>I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I discussed this ages ag
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
> I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
> bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
> backwards. Really.
I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I discussed this ages ago (I
forget exactly when); apparently
Martin Bochnig wrote:
>Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I did just have a very interesting discussion with a Chipdesigner from Berlin.
>>He is interested in working on a complete OpenSource platform and he is
>>looking
>>for people who are interested in helping with this project.
>>
What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port?
Is the project
still active? There were not any status reports or
updates in the last
months.
Bruno
-
Cyril, PPC for Solaris community lead, can best answer
that question over in the PowerPC discussions group
Er, I jumped the gun. I need SX:CR. B56 sources and archives are available,
sure, but those have been available for some time in nightlies.
So I'm still looking for an ETA on SX:CR B56 itself. Friday? Sooner? Will a
case of beer smooth the process? :)
benr.
This message posted from op
> On 1/29/07, Bob Palowoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC
> port?
> > > Is the project
> > > still active? There were not any status reports
> or
> > > updates in the last
> > > months.
> > >
> >
> > A better place for the question might be:
> >
> h
Thanks for the clarification Steve. I was about to have a heart attack. :)
Incidentally, none of the putbacks were flagged as "Duckhorn". The big pieces
were integrated as 3 separate PSARC's which I reported here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18813&tstart=0
Thanks for
duckhorn went in, revision 3286:676ea7fe99f4 in the Hg repository. The
reason it didn't show in the changelog is due to a bug in my delivery
scripts which assumed two week build cycles. The holiday break caused
my changelog generation to miss that week's worth of putbacks.
cheers,
steve
Dic
It looks like Opensolaris b56 came out over the weekend:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b56/on-changelog-b56.html
Isn't it normally 2 weeks before that becomes SXCR?
Incidentally, I hope I missed something, because I see no mention of
duckhorn in that changelog
On 29/01/07, Ben Rock
Is there an ETA for SX:CR B56? I've got a lot of things on hold for this
release. I know the B55 respin threw a wrench in the works, but any updates or
best guesses as to when we'll see 56 would be appreciated.
benr.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 1/29/07, Bob Palowoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port?
> Is the project
> still active? There were not any status reports or
> updates in the last
> months.
>
A better place for the question might be:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa
Richard Lowe wrote:
I'd like to see more details first.
Sources? continued development and work in the community?
I'm not seeing much in the above (though maybe that's me being dense)
that seems opensolaris related. We are neither a hosting service, nor a
marketing organization...
I underst
Stephen Lau wrote:
Are you intending to provide any source, or do any open development?
The plan is to provide the SDK initially so that we establish the apis
that we use for use in other projects (eg. http://www.fedora.info)
Once we have some agreement on that we will look at opening up
Ho
Peter Buckingham wrote:
Hi All,
Honeycomb is a unique archival storage product developed within Sun. It
is built upon a clustered system and provides strong reliability
guarantees for it's data storage (Write-Once, Read Many) and metadata.
We (the development team) would like to start to pro
Peter Buckingham wrote:
Hi All,
Honeycomb is a unique archival storage product developed within Sun. It
is built upon a clustered system and provides strong reliability
guarantees for it's data storage (Write-Once, Read Many) and metadata.
We (the development team) would like to start to pro
Tom Haynes wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Tom Haynes wrote:
Could we get links for the latest SUNWpro, SUNWonbld, and closed
binaries added? That way, instead of having to know the date, we
could automate pulling down the latest bits from the mecurial
repository and also getting the matching bits
Hi All,
Honeycomb is a unique archival storage product developed within Sun. It
is built upon a clustered system and provides strong reliability
guarantees for it's data storage (Write-Once, Read Many) and metadata.
We (the development team) would like to start to provide information
about t
> What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port?
> Is the project
> still active? There were not any status reports or
> updates in the last
> months.
>
A better place for the question might be:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=5
or check out the ppc community pages:
http
Tom Haynes wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Tom Haynes wrote:
Could we get links for the latest SUNWpro, SUNWonbld, and closed
binaries added? That way, instead of having to know the date, we
could automate pulling down the latest bits from the mecurial
repository and also getting the matching bits
I'd love to know how gnome-volume-manager now is started? If anyone could
enlighten me I'd be most thankful.
AFAIK /usr/share/gnome/autostart/gnome-volume-manager.desktop
-Artem.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris
Stephen Lau wrote:
Tom Haynes wrote:
Could we get links for the latest SUNWpro, SUNWonbld, and closed
binaries added? That way, instead of having to know the date, we
could automate pulling down the latest bits from the mecurial
repository and also getting the matching bits needed to do a full
You would be better off asking the opengrok-discuss mailing list.
cheers,
steve
Bruce Furber wrote:
I have OpenGrok installed on Suse SLES10
It does not seem to be recognizing that the SRC_ROOT is a CVS repository
Search return file names with the like this Util.java,v with the ,v and the
Michelle Olson wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you. I will ask the
gatekeeper to make this change if there are more folks who prefer gzip to
bzip2--you are the first to ask.
Regards,
MIchelle
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Michelle Olson wrote:
> I like really this, you rock. I should know the answer, but I
> honestly need to dbl-check as you are the first to republish. Thank
> you, because this makes all the work worth it, to see the pages out
> there in a new way immediately.
IANAL, but I th
Tom Haynes wrote:
Could we get links for the latest SUNWpro, SUNWonbld, and closed binaries
added? That way, instead of having to know the date, we could automate pulling
down the latest bits from the mecurial repository and also getting the matching
bits needed to do a full build.
That way,
What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port? Is the project
still active? There were not any status reports or updates in the last
months.
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
O.kI have entered the bug report.
//Lars
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 1/29/07, Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you. I will ask the
gatekeeper to make this change if there are more folks who prefer gzip to
bzip2--you are the first to ask.
I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. Th
Hi Joerg,
Just talked to Bonnie, this was an oversight. We are still working on the list
of SCCS related man pages, so they missed this drop. Thanks for asking about
these, I appreciate your help to make sure the pages you need are made
available.
Regards,
Michelle
This message posted from
Hi Rich,
Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you. I will ask the
gatekeeper to make this change if there are more folks who prefer gzip to
bzip2--you are the first to ask.
Regards,
MIchelle
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Hi Dennis,
I like really this, you rock. I should know the answer, but I honestly need to
dbl-check as you are the first to republish. Thank you, because this makes all
the work worth it, to see the pages out there in a new way immediately.
Regards,
Michelle
This message posted from openso
Hi Lars,
Thanks for catching this issue and reporting it, I'll forward this on for
filing or you can feel free to file a bug under category Solaris Man Pages at
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ using the 'submit a bug' link.
Thanks,
Michelle
This message posted from opensolaris.org
59 matches
Mail list logo
