On 12/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the beginning the opensolaris source index with OpenGok was
extremely useful; unfortunately, it has become useless, IMHO, because
it also indexes all projects on opensolaris.org.
Another thing is that opengrok used to show history go
I have a slightly unusual setup that allows me to dual boot between Windows XP
and Solaris (currently SXCR build 53) by going into the BIOS setup and changing
the boot device. My main disk, which is for Windows XP, is a RAID 0 array on a
Silicon Image 3112A SATA controller on the motherboard. Un
In the beginning the opensolaris source index with OpenGok was
extremely useful; unfortunately, it has become useless, IMHO, because
it also indexes all projects on opensolaris.org.
Typical projects duplicate most of the ON source base and OpenGrok
makes no attempt in sorting hits; I see all hits
Thanks for sharing, Young.
Finally... I was waiting for this very moment. This a milestone, indeed.
I have to say, this gives us a LOT of work for a new year. :) As far as
I can see it's going keep us busy for a LONGER while.
Best,
Michal
___
openso
(Hi! I'm passing on this announcement from Ienup who's not available at
the moment. Please read on the good news. :-) Happy holidays!)
Hello,
I'm delighted to have an honor to announce that we, Sun G11N, have open
sourced Solaris G11N source code at OpenSolaris.org and the source code
can be
> Rich Teer wrote:
> > At the moment, yes. But I think it would be a
> desirable long term
> > goal to have OpenSolaris becoame a separate legal
> entity, much like
> > the Apache Foundation.
>
> This would make financial contributions from other
> entities much easier.
> It would additionally h
> We just put together a new system for ZFS use at a
> company, and twice
> in one week we've had the system wedge. You can log
> on, but the zpools
> are hosed, and a reboot never occurs if requested
> since it can't
> unmount the zfs volumes. So, only a power cycle
> works.
>
I've tried to repro
> I'm not sure where the problem lies exactly. I've
> now got it somewhat working. Just as a datapoint, I
> put 6.8 onto svn_38 and it worked great.
>
>
> Any advice would be most welcome as I'm starting to
> lose my mind here. ;)
>
> -brian
>
> ps: I don't seem to be able to attach the c
On 12/22/06, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Option "MetaModes" "1024x768-1280x1024"
>The above line is interpreted as the resolution for
>"Display0-Display1", so what you would want here is
>"1280x1024-1280x1024".
I had mistaken that for the range of supported resolutions, not th
Eric Enright wrote:
> Linux overcommits / lazy loads on memory allocations, though this is
> tunable. I believe the default setting is to overcommit, which can
> lead to the random killing of processes in order to retrieve memory
> should one run out. I forget the terminology used for that partic
Has anyone tried/succeeded in fully installing S11/SXCE on a Tyan S3992
motherboard-based system?
I bought one of their TA26(B3992) barebones server chassis to use as a
fileserver because of it's convenient 8-bay hotswap SATA front panel, and
figured that whatever bumps would appear in the road
>> Option "MetaModes" "1024x768-1280x1024"
>The above line is interpreted as the resolution for
>"Display0-Display1", so what you would want here is
>"1280x1024-1280x1024".
Ah Ha
I had mistaken that for the range of supported resolutions, not the resolution
of each screen.
That did the tri
Cyril Plisko writes:
> Following your logic - what is the reason the thing below is defined there ?
>
> 96 /*
> 97 * structure packing like #pragma pack(1)
> 98 */
> 99 #define __sun_attr___packed__ __attribute__((__packed__))
>
> Since __PACKED presumably should be just a shorthand version
>
On 12/22/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cyril Plisko writes:
> > Note that choice of consolidation has nothing at all to do with
> > whether you can deliver to /usr/bin, to the root partition, or even
> > new kernel modules; all of those are possible outside of ON. It has
> > more
> I'd like to create a mechanism by which a kernel driver can "poll" on media
> changes on USB removeable media, such as:
>
> - floppy ejection
> - memory stick unplugs
Hmm, an USB memory stick has fixed media. It's the scsa2usb
driver that pretends the usb storage device is a remov
Cyril Plisko writes:
> > Note that choice of consolidation has nothing at all to do with
> > whether you can deliver to /usr/bin, to the root partition, or even
> > new kernel modules; all of those are possible outside of ON. It has
> > more to do with where your fellow travelers are located. ;-}
"Eric Enright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linux overcommits / lazy loads on memory allocations, though this is
> tunable. I believe the default setting is to overcommit, which can
> lead to the random killing of processes in order to retrieve memory
> should one run out. I forget the terminolo
>Peter Buckingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Think of a situation where the memory footprint of the parent is large
>> and you want execute something with a small footprint, eg execing
>> something from a java process.
>>
>> The fact that you are execing means you don't need to access the a
>huy vu wrote:
>> Thank to you both, Nacho and Joerg. However I would love to hear why
>> the call to exec would fail right after a call to fork(). From
>> reading things about vfork() it sounds like its sole purpose is to
>> allow people to call exec right after a fork. I just like to
>> understa
>On 12/21/06, huy vu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Could someone tell me why one must use vfork() if one is to call exec right
>> after? I am seeing e
xec fails right after doing a fork() and would like to under stand why before
trying vfork()
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Huy
>vfork() is not thread safe and
20 matches
Mail list logo
