Hi ,
When I give xmms on solaris8 sparc arch the gui comes up , but I am unable to
select the songs to playlist.
when I checked the preferences option I couldn't find out any of the plugins
there.
So then I clicked on configure plugin it crashes out with this error.
[i]Segmentation fault
Yo
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Roland Mainz wrote:
> John Beck wrote:
> >
> > Roland> I have a small problem with my "sendmail" setup in Solaris
> > Roland> 11/B48/SPARC and can't make heads or tails out of the problem...
> >
> > First, you should not be editing sendmail.cf directly, but instead you
> > sho
> Christine Sterner wrote:
>> Sorry, I haven't been following the whole thread but check out:
>>
>> http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solaris_apps/index.jsp.
>>
>> There is an entry for "Solaris Enterprise System Virtual Appliance for
>> VMware"
>>
>> Runs on x86/x64 desktops or servers.
I did a find for apachectl and it finds it in three locations
/usr/apache/bin/apachectl
/usr/apache2/bin/apachectl
/opt/csw/apache2/sbin/apachectl
The first is an apache 1.3 install, the second an apache 2.0.52 install the the
third is an apache 2.2.3 install.
After looking at the package on th
Christine Sterner wrote:
Sorry, I haven't been following the whole thread but check out:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solaris_apps/index.jsp.
There is an entry for "Solaris Enterprise System Virtual Appliance for
VMware"
Runs on x86/x64 desktops or servers...
I'm not sure if
An update,
Using svcs -xv i found the logfile which contained..
[ Nov 22 19:35:06 Method "start" exited with status 1 ]
[ Nov 22 19:35:06 Executing start method
("/lib/svc/method/http-apache2 start") ]
Syntax error on line 275 of /etc/apache2/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/apache2/libexec/mod_jk.s
Dennis Clarke writes:
>
> > See also, here:
> >
> > http://star-wip.eng.sun.com/software/solaris/virtual_learning_center.jsp
> >
>
> oops ..
>
> Server not found
> Firefox can't find the server at star-wip.eng.sun.com.
It's a SWAN web site. You need to be inside Sun to see it. But this
should
> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 09:45 am, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Probably just morons like me that like to have licenses in place and
>> support contracts. Thankfully the support contracts from Sun costs
>> pennies. Or at least coffee money per day.
>
> My experience as a consultant before jo
> See also, here:
>
> http://star-wip.eng.sun.com/software/solaris/virtual_learning_center.jsp
>
oops ..
Server not found
Firefox can't find the server at star-wip.eng.sun.com.
dc
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or
On 11/22/06, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why Xnest can't be setgid root?
None that we know of, we've just never done a security audit on the
code that's specific to Xnest to verify that it's safe to run setgid.
Many sites
> On 2006-11-22 19:11:17 +0100 Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> It just feels like the second coming will be here before Adobe
>> Acrobat for
>> Solaris x86 or VMware for Solaris x86. What do we need to do? Take a
>> community collection of money and hire a hit man? Its nuts I tell
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 09:45 am, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Probably just morons like me that like to have licenses in place and
> support contracts. Thankfully the support contracts from Sun costs
> pennies. Or at least coffee money per day.
My experience as a consultant before joining Sun
I'm trying to get Apache 2 to use mod_jk in a Solaris 10 Zone. I have installed
the ap2_mod_jk package from blastwave with no errors. I added the following
line to the correct httpd.conf
LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
And then try to start apache using
svcadm enable apache2
I then do
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 08:02 am, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> The answers get better and better! Thanks for the info, James.
>
> On Nov 21, 2006, at 9:53 PM, James C. McPherson wrote:
> > You've probably got a version of the Intel iprb installed so a
> > quick update_drv to add its alias should be
See also, here:
http://star-wip.eng.sun.com/software/solaris/virtual_learning_center.jsp
-chris
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Sorry, I haven't been following the whole thread but check out:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solaris_apps/index.jsp.
There is an entry for "Solaris Enterprise S
Hi Dennis,
I have forwarded to the folks who own the program. Stay tuned.
[insert 21 Century Keanu "I know kung-fu" here]
;)
-chris
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Sorry, I haven't been following the whole thread but check out:
>>
>> http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solaris_apps/index.js
> Just a quick note to let you all know that today was my last day at Sun.
> OpenSolaris has been an amazing experience -- you all have taught me so much
> over the past two years (for those of you pilot members).
Has it been that long? Has time flown past that fast?
It has. Indeed it has.
I
Peter Tribble wrote:
Is there any particular reason why Xnest can't be setgid root?
None that we know of, we've just never done a security audit on the
code that's specific to Xnest to verify that it's safe to run setgid.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun M
On 2006-11-22 19:11:17 +0100 Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It just feels like the second coming will be here before Adobe
Acrobat for
Solaris x86 or VMware for Solaris x86. What do we need to do? Take a
community collection of money and hire a hit man? Its nuts I tell
you. We
Cl
> Sorry, I haven't been following the whole thread but check out:
>
> http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solaris_apps/index.jsp.
>
> There is an entry for "Solaris Enterprise System Virtual Appliance for
> VMware"
>
> Runs on x86/x64 desktops or servers...
>
> I'm not sure if this is what
On 11/22/06, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> default permissions for .X11-pipe and .X11-unix seems to be 0775 with
ownership root:root.
>
> This prevents Xnest from running. I saw that in Solaris 2.5.1 the
permissions originally have been 0777 and
Bob Palowoda wrote:
I've downloaded b51 and tried to upgrade my
workstation which is
currently running on b50 with no problems.
Motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-K8U with 3 GB RAM and an
AMD Athlon 64 3000+.
oot w/no debugging:
Interesting no comments on a panic.
---Bob
And there's mo
Sorry, I haven't been following the whole thread but check out:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solaris_apps/index.jsp.
There is an entry for "Solaris Enterprise System Virtual Appliance for
VMware"
Runs on x86/x64 desktops or servers...
I'm not sure if this is what you are looki
> "Dennis" == Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dennis> Does anyone know what Andy Tucker is doing over at VMware? Are we
> ever
> Dennis> going to see VMware release something for Solaris 10 ?
>
> I don't know about Solaris 10 specifically or Andy Tucker, but I
> noticed a few months
"Dennis" == Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dennis> Does anyone know what Andy Tucker is doing over at VMware? Are we ever
Dennis> going to see VMware release something for Solaris 10 ?
I don't know about Solaris 10 specifically or Andy Tucker, but I
noticed a few months back, shortly
>> On 11/22/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > For this I goto the VMware website to find their docs. Also .. I wonder
>> if
>> > ESX server is still insanely expensive for small guys like me.
>
> Don't worry, Dennis; my wife keeps telling me that size doesn't matter! :-)
a
Chris Ricker wrote:
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I mean this is just insane. Don't tell me people actually fork out that
sort
of money to Red Hat for an inferior OS. In order to run VMware I need to
get a license of some Linux and then, and only then, am I able to run my
virtual S
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> >> I mean this is just insane. Don't tell me people actually fork out that
>> >> sort
>> >> of money to Red Hat for an inferior OS. In order to run VMware I need
>> to
>> >> get a license of some Linux and then, and only then, am I able to run
>> m
> Dennis Clarke writes:
>> I mean this is just insane. Don't tell me people actually fork out that
>> sort
>> of money to Red Hat for an inferior OS. In order to run VMware I need to
>> get a license of some Linux and then, and only then, am I able to run my
>> virtual Solaris servers? ( if you
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >> I mean this is just insane. Don't tell me people actually fork out that
> >> sort
> >> of money to Red Hat for an inferior OS. In order to run VMware I need to
> >> get a license of some Linux and then, and only then, am I able to run my
> >> virtual
> On 11/22/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I have VMWare Virtual Server running on FC6 with multiple Solaris VM
>> > inside. The software costed me a very modest amount of money (zero).
>> > Would that setup fit your need ?
>>
>> Well, that's perfect of course. The next question
Dennis Clarke writes:
> I mean this is just insane. Don't tell me people actually fork out that sort
> of money to Red Hat for an inferior OS. In order to run VMware I need to
> get a license of some Linux and then, and only then, am I able to run my
> virtual Solaris servers? ( if you think Wind
> On 11/22/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For this I goto the VMware website to find their docs. Also .. I wonder if
> > ESX server is still insanely expensive for small guys like me.
Don't worry, Dennis; my wife keeps telling me that size doesn't matter! :-)
--
Rich Tee
On 11/22/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have VMWare Virtual Server running on FC6 with multiple Solaris VM
> inside. The software costed me a very modest amount of money (zero).
> Would that setup fit your need ?
Well, that's perfect of course. The next question is the spec. I
> On 11/22/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> virtualization with stability
>>
>> I look to VMware for that. They seem to have been in business a long time
>> at it, or at least long enough time in a young market. Forget experiments
>> like QEMU and Xen which are still working
The answers get better and better! Thanks for the info, James.
On Nov 21, 2006, at 9:53 PM, James C. McPherson wrote:
You've probably got a version of the Intel iprb installed so a
quick update_drv to add its alias should be sufficient.
It's the Intel BOXDP965LTCK motherboard with 82566DC Gig
prtconf ... I knew there was a Sol command to tell me more. I kept
trying to
figure it out from dmesg. Like I said, Solaris was a few years ago
for me.
The Blade 100 is running OpenBSD these days :)
Thanks for the pointer, I'll be back . I'd check it now but that's me
home box.
Apologies
> On 11/22/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> virtualization with stability
>>
>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 AS 64-bit at $1499 ?!?!
>> see https://www.redhat.com/apps/commerce/
>>
>> I mean this is just insane. Don't tell me people actually fork out that
>> sort
>> of m
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Hi,
default permissions for .X11-pipe and .X11-unix seems to be 0775 with ownership
root:root.
This prevents Xnest from running. I saw that in Solaris 2.5.1 the permissions
originally have been 0777 and a patch changed it to 0775. I suspect that there
was no support
On 11/22/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
virtualization with stability
I look to VMware for that. They seem to have been in business a long time
at it, or at least long enough time in a young market. Forget experiments
like QEMU and Xen which are still working towards being comm
On 11/22/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
virtualization with stability
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 AS 64-bit at $1499 ?!?!
see https://www.redhat.com/apps/commerce/
I mean this is just insane. Don't tell me people actually fork out that sort
of money to Red Hat for an in
virtualization with stability
I look to VMware for that. They seem to have been in business a long time
at it, or at least long enough time in a young market. Forget experiments
like QEMU and Xen which are still working towards being commercial grade.
But VMware doesn't have anything that runs
"Dana H. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> > I would think that a Bluetooth implementation for Solaris just begs to
> > be STREAMS based (and at some level, would have to be anyway).
> > Are there any existing CDDL-compatible STREAMS-based implementations?
>
> Not th
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Al Hopper wrote:
> You will be missed! Thank you very much, for all your hard work and
> many contributions to OpenSolaris.
>
> Personally, I've enjoyed working with you and my overall impression, was
> that when I saw a message from you, it was always good news and forward
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Karyn Ritter wrote:
> Just a quick note to let you all know that today was my last day at Sun.
> OpenSolaris has been an amazing experience -- you all have taught me so
> much over the past two years (for those of you pilot members).
Karyn,
You will be missed! Thank you ver
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Hello,
As I see people stop discussing about all this, but I have check Open Group
website and I check that price for CDE source are astronomical!
In my opinion Open Group is providing too big price for CDE.
It doesn’t cost such money.
CDE source prices were not intended
> Where is the option to change L&F's in Netbeans 5.X
> (if there is one)?
> I had a brief look earlier but I couldn't see it.
Other than the --laf option on the command line. If you really want a different
L&F for netbeans look at https://substance-netbeans.dev.java.net/
Doug
This message
Iban Nieto writes:
> Oh, yes, the web page says this, but in:
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/devref_toc/devref_2/;jsessionid=F3EE208B352A3112506C1827C88F9128
>
> You can read "In general, any computer which will run Solaris 10, Solaris
> Express, or another OpenSolaris-based distrib
Oh, yes, the web page says this, but in:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/devref_toc/devref_2/;jsessionid=F3EE208B352A3112506C1827C88F9128
You can read "In general, any computer which will run Solaris 10, Solaris
Express, or another OpenSolaris-based distribution is adequate for this
p
>
> Where is the option to change L&F's in Netbeans 5.X
> (if there is one)?
> I had a brief look earlier but I couldn't see it.
/opt/netbeans-5.5/bin/netbeans --laf com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk.GTKLookAndFeel
-J-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=lcd
Its close but not quite there yet.
Doug
This
As for CDE, it seems still maintained by Sun for their port (CDE 1.x). You
could research on how this forks from the Open Group's CDE code. Using the
included CDE that comes with Solaris seems a better solution for this timeframe
as it also comes with docs (or did). At least we can track CDE thr
Iban Nieto writes:
> Is possible to build OpenSolaris in Solaris 6/06 or is only limited to SXCR??
As described on the web page, you need SX:CR to build Open Solaris.
That's why SX:CR exists.
--
James Carlson, KISS Network<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Driv
Hello,
As I see people stop discussing about all this, but I have check Open Group
website and I check that price for CDE source are astronomical!
In my opinion Open Group is providing too big price for CDE.
It doesn’t cost such money.
Thank You.
Kind Regards,
Girts
This message posted from
Doug Scott wrote:
The Metal L&F in Java 1.5 is Great! It's extensively
different from
Metal in Java 1.4 (which wasn't stellar). The Java
1.5 GTK L&F is a bit
demented as far as colours and widgets go.
Josh,
The Metal L&F matches nothing else on Solaris. Not CDE, not JDS version
whateve
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On 11/22/06, Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, yes. We're extremely aware of the pain the sd driver's reliance on
"geometry" causes. And the confusion/frustration to users. The one and
only reason why this isn't simply ripped out and consig
On 11/22/06, Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, yes. We're extremely aware of the pain the sd driver's reliance on
"geometry" causes. And the confusion/frustration to users. The one and
only reason why this isn't simply ripped out and consigned to the big pile
is compatibility - how
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Chuck Meo wrote:
[ ... ]
devices which just uses a size in blocks or some such, or all that nasty
geometry stuff should be consigned to the dustbin of history.
Amen. Can I sign up for that religion ? I'd sacrifice a candle and burn a
chicken ... or some such.
However
Aaron Williams wrote:
I am still trying to figure out how to download the kernel source code. So far
it seems that every method listed on the web site is broken, i.e. SVN does not
work, and there are no links to any tarballs. Furthermore, attempts to obtain
a CD or DVD fail because it asks f
> > Bonnie Corwin mailed [3] with 2 updates to the Sun
> Contributor Agreement (SCA), both
> > minor giving more freedom to companies registering
> their employees. Along with
> > this, Bonnie posted details of the SCA FAQ.
> >
> > 3.
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-anno
> unce
Hi!!
Is possible to build OpenSolaris in Solaris 6/06 or is only limited to SXCR??
Thank you
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> I've downloaded b51 and tried to upgrade my
> workstation which is
> currently running on b50 with no problems.
> Motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-K8U with 3 GB RAM and an
> AMD Athlon 64 3000+.
> oot w/no debugging:
>
Interesting no comments on a panic.
---Bob
This message posted from
61 matches
Mail list logo
