Hi ...
Here are some images from the Nihon Sun User Group Symposium yesterday in Tokyo:
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/entry/nsug_photos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimgris/sets/72157594295557391/
A bunch of people were taking pictures all day long, so I expect many more
images to show up. T
I'm running build 44 on a dual dual-core Opteron. Root, /usr, and swap are on
SVM mirrors on a pair of SATA disks on a SiI 3114; the machine serves about a
hundred NFS and SMB clients from two large UFS filesystems on Apple Xraids
connected by LSI FibreChannel cards; it is also our master NIS s
Something like this?
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0545/6mgbberiq?q=pkg&a=view
/jason
Trevor Maggs wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me where I can find information on what software packages are available on each of the 4 installation groups? ie
Entire Solaris Software Group
Developer S
Hi,
Can someone tell me where I can find information on what software packages are
available on each of the 4 installation groups? ie
Entire Solaris Software Group
Developer Solaris Software Group
End User Solaris Software Group
Core System Support Software Group
I am asking because I dont w
I have a network card that needs a driveralias added to Solaris before it will
work successfully - the drivers are bundled with Solaris 10. Is there any way
that I can add a driver alias while I'm installing Solaris, so that I can
complete the installer as if the driveralias were present on the
>And we would need to be able to live in 32 MB.
Nah, soon they won't be able to get chips with only 32MB of
memory (One reason why SunRay memory doubled at some point
was lack of smaller chips)
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolar
Hi,
A new release of BeleniX is now available with the following
salient features:
1) The significant feature of this release is support for read-only
mounting and accessing both Ext2FS and NTFS partitions on either
Primary or Logical Partitions.
2) Updated to a recent pre-build48 snapsho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >And some choose to stop shipping immediately.
> >
> >Cisco did first publish source and later startes with a cheaper hardware and
> >VXWorks instead of Linux and Linux will not boot because of too few RAM/NVRAM
>
> It remains to be seen how much better the CDDL fares
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 05:01:19AM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote:
> What do you mean with "respin" ? Were the B48 source tarballs be changed
> or was the respin neccesary because something outside OS/Net needed to
> be fixed ?
There was an egregious bug found in ON at the last minute, for which we
ne
* Matthew Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-22 13:11]:
> I see the Sun Tech Days slides from the Seattle event are posted on
> developer.sun.com/techdays, but it doesn't look like the OpenSolaris
> Day slides were included. Does anyone know if those are still
> upcoming? I've been waiting to get
>And some choose to stop shipping immediately.
>
>Cisco did first publish source and later startes with a cheaper hardware and
>VXWorks instead of Linux and Linux will not boot because of too few RAM/NVRAM
It remains to be seen how much better the CDDL fares here.
(And we're of course hampered
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >In case this is not yet known: it is impossible to force source distribution.
> >You only have the opportunity to stop distribution at all.
> >
> >The GPL is not considered a contract but "general conditions" in court.
>
>
> Ah, but therein lies the rub: if you can pr
I see the Sun Tech Days slides from the Seattle event are posted on
developer.sun.com/techdays, but it doesn't look like the OpenSolaris Day slides
were included. Does anyone know if those are still upcoming? I've been waiting
to get my hands on the performance and observability presentation!
T
>In case this is not yet known: it is impossible to force source distribution.
>You only have the opportunity to stop distribution at all.
>
>The GPL is not considered a contract but "general conditions" in court.
Ah, but therein lies the rub: if you can prevent distribution if people
do not dis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >> A German court did claim two times (although not asked) that GPL §2
> >> is most likely void.
> >>
> >> http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
> >>
> >> As the underlying law (European Copyright) is valid for more people than US
>
>Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> A German court did claim two times (although not asked) that GPL §2
>> is most likely void.
>>
>> http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
>>
>> As the underlying law (European Copyright) is valid for more people than US
>> copyright law, this seems to be an impor
>> Due to a respin, SXCR build 48 will be available on Monday (9/25) rather
>> than Friday (9/22) as scheduled. Just wanted to give you all a heads up.
>
> Awww, and I was looking forward to spending my birthday (tomorrow, 9/23)
> upgrading my development box, which I haven't touched since b42 or
> Due to a respin, SXCR build 48 will be available on Monday (9/25) rather
> than Friday (9/22) as scheduled. Just wanted to give you all a heads up.
Awww, and I was looking forward to spending my birthday (tomorrow, 9/23)
upgrading my development box, which I haven't touched since b42 or so. O
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > A German court did claim two times (although not asked) that GPL §2
> > is most likely void.
> >
> > http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
> >
> > As the underlying law (European Copyright) is valid for more people
Joerg Schilling wrote:
A German court did claim two times (although not asked) that GPL §2
is most likely void.
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
As the underlying law (European Copyright) is valid for more people than US
copyright law, this seems to be an important information.
I
You are alex terekhov & I claim my £5.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>Are you referring to the VIA Epia series? There is a whole pile of different
>VIA Epia models?
Yes. But they are for the most part variations on a theme.
>They even have a VIA CPU. Is that a 32- or 64-bit CPU?
32 bit.
>Which network driver(s) is the Solaris kernel using for those motherboar
> There's no device naming register so stuff like this
> can always happen with
> external drivers.
OK, then let's create one. What needs to be done?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@op
> There's only "one" kind (there are several different,
> all mini-ITX with
> more or fewer builtin functions; they seem to work
> fine under Solaris)
Are you referring to the VIA Epia series? There is a whole pile of different
VIA Epia models?
They even have a VIA CPU. Is that a 32- or 64-bit C
>> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that
>> ethernet drivers
>> all should have names ending in "e".
>
>Eee... I'm confused even more now. I just ran a man "rfe" and also a `find` on
>/kernel and /platform for "rfe*", and came up with nothing.
>
>So if you or the person who came up
> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that
> ethernet drivers
> all should have names ending in "e".
Eee... I'm confused even more now. I just ran a man "rfe" and also a `find` on
/kernel and /platform for "rfe*", and came up with nothing.
So if you or the person who came up with the
On 21/09/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These VIA boards work fine with PXE boot (for suitably modified
miniroot) and they also boot fine from flash.
(We've installed Solaris on a flash card device on one of them)
Don't suppose you know if their SATA controllers are support
A German court did claim two times (although not asked) that GPL §2
is most likely void.
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
As the underlying law (European Copyright) is valid for more people than US
copyright law, this seems to be an important information.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Seriously, I hope this renaming is *NOT* happening. Renaming is a
> >serious matter, particularly for network drivers, because it forces
> >users to modify configuration files scattered across the system.
> >
> >There's no requirement whatsoever that Ethernet drivers e
I've downloaded and installed Solaris 10 Update 2 in CD form using the ISO
images and have not had any problems with it. That would suggest that Sun's
servers do have a good copy of the files, but that something in between is
causing you get to borked versions as you suggest.
Cheers
Andrew.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> >> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
>> >> was renamed
>> >> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusion in
>> >> Solaris.
>> >
>> >Which driver is "rh" clashing with?
>>
>>
>> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet dri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
> >> was renamed
> >> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusion in
> >> Solaris.
> >
> >Which driver is "rh" clashing with?
>
>
> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers
> all s
"Ramesh Polepalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please tell me How to create ISO image of a cd/dvd on Solaris.
Use readcd(1) to read the CD/DVD and write it into a file.
Then write this again to CD/DVD using cdrecord.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
Hi
I have noticed that S10-u2-ga-x86-v3.iso.zip and S10-u2 -ga-x86-v5.iso.zip
files seems to be truncated at Sun Download service.
i get 90% of the ISO image 3 and 65 % of ISO image 5
I realise that this can be a problem with a local Caching server in our
vincinity .
I hope someone
mini-itx / nano-itx
http://mini-itx.com/store/
Nice kit (if a little pricy).
On 22/09/06, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These VIA boards work fine with PXE boot (for
> suitably modified
> miniroot) and they also boot fine from flash.
>
>
> (We've installed Solaris on a flash card dev
>> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
>> was renamed
>> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusion in
>> Solaris.
>
>Which driver is "rh" clashing with?
It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers
all should have names ending in "e".
Casper
___
>> These VIA boards work fine with PXE boot (for
>> suitably modified
>> miniroot) and they also boot fine from flash.
>>
>>
>> (We've installed Solaris on a flash card device on
>> one of them)
>
>Which "VIA boards"? Who is the manufacturer of the appliance, and what is the
>appliance model na
To create ISO image:
mkisofs -o xxx.iso -J -R /full-path-to-data/
To burn the CD:
cdrw -i /full-path/xxx.iso
- Judy
Ramesh Polepalli wrote:
Please tell me How to create ISO image of a cd/dvd on Solaris.
Thanks in advance for the help.
___
opensol
>
> What about adding this to the OpenSolaris Network
> Appliance project?
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/appliances/an
> nouncements/
> solnetapp/
This mentions OpenSolaris running on a Soekris appliance, but no details. Or
was the just a proposal?
Has anyone actually tried t
> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
> was renamed
> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusion in
> Solaris.
Which driver is "rh" clashing with?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
openso
> These VIA boards work fine with PXE boot (for
> suitably modified
> miniroot) and they also boot fine from flash.
>
>
> (We've installed Solaris on a flash card device on
> one of them)
Which "VIA boards"? Who is the manufacturer of the appliance, and what is the
appliance model name?
Thi
Hi,
Please tell me How to create ISO image of a cd/dvd on
Solaris.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Regards,
Ramesh
P S
An AlwaysOn AO100 Top Private Company – 2006
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential a
42 matches
Mail list logo
