>
> That's a bit of a back down from your previous
> assertion of
> malice on the part of Sun's engineers.
>
> If you're going to make claims like you did earlier,
> provide the
> evidence to back it up or don't make the assertion.
>
>
> James C. McPherson
>
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Frank -- In case this helps...
http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/smacking_super_smack_into_shape
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Start with running mkheaders which will be in your path somewhe
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
For those who have been trying to explore a move
from Linux to Solaris,
"the" most frustrating problem (plse note I didn't
say "one of . . .") is
the inability to make NIC work under Solaris.
Sun's developers seem determined to exclude ALL of those drivers for NICs
tha
Have you considered requesting such support via
http://www.opensolaris.org/bug/report.jspa
Having such requests for enhancements let the community know about the missing
functionality and provides a way to track its progress (at the moment, modulo
any issues with bugs.opensolaris.org!)
Please
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
How stuck am I once I decide to install Solaris 10, or Solaris
Community Edition? How much do I have to blow away to switch to the
other one? I mean, obviously it's easy if I scrub the disks down and
start over from scratch, but I'm wondering if t
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Rod Evans wrote:
I'd have thought things could be simpler by adding:
-L usr/local/mysql/lib -L /usr/local/lib
to the link-edit command line (LDFLAGS?).
And don't forget, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is recognized by the runtime linker
(ld.so.1)
too. Thus you are forcing a
> > For those who have been trying to explore a move
> from Linux to Solaris,
> > "the" most frustrating problem (plse note I didn't
> say "one of . . .") is
> > the inability to make NIC work under Solaris.
> Sun's developers seem
> determined to exclude ALL of those drivers for NICs
> that are
Thanks, Ed. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to get
you set up.
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Ed Nadolski wrote:
The T10 SCSI OSD specification defines a command protocol that allows data to be
stored and managed as logical objects rather than as blocks of data. We would
like to propose an open
Thanks, Joerg. Your proposal has been seconded. I'll contact you offline
to get you set up.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Hi,
as it seems that real work is done with ksh93 integration after a
maling list and a project hast bee created, I propose to create something
similar for star
Frank -- In case this helps...
http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/smacking_super_smack_into_shape
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:20:13PM +0200, "Dhr, Markus ICC-H" wrote:
> > I cannot figure out why it will be complaining for contract
> > id (ctdid) header not present in /usr/include/sys/siginfo.
> >
> > Once again this is probably something really trivial and 101
> > but I can really use some i
> I cannot figure out why it will be complaining for contract
> id (ctdid) header not present in /usr/include/sys/siginfo.
>
> Once again this is probably something really trivial and 101
> but I can really use some input.
It's not complaining about the header not beeing there but ctid_t not
de
Frank Mash writes:
> /usr/include/sys/siginfo.h:259: error: 'ctid_t' is used as a type, but is not
>defined as a type.
> /usr/include/sys/siginfo.h:390: error: 'ctid_t' is used as a type, but is not
>defined as a type.
This looks like the usual gcc fixincludes issue. If you upgrade the
sy
Hello all,
I was so happy earlier to finally get Sysbench to compile (thanks to all the
brains here).
Unfortunately as much as I wanted to solve my next compilation issue myself, I
can't. Both me and my SA have been working on this but we cannot get a grip on
this.
The issue involves compili
On 9/8/06, Jürgen Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Login with the root password in single user mode, and try to
fix the X11 server setup.
What probably works is switching back from "Xorg" to the "Xsun"
server. This can be done by running the command "kdmconfig".
Yep, works fine. Thanks! I'l
Rod Evans wrote:
I'd have thought things could be simpler by adding:
-L usr/local/mysql/lib -L /usr/local/lib
to the link-edit command line (LDFLAGS?).
And don't forget, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is recognized by the runtime linker
(ld.so.1)
too. Thus you are forcing all commands executed wi
Frank Mash wrote:
# Set up my environment
CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
CFLAGS=-xarch=v9
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/mysql/lib:/usr/ccs/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/ucblib
These three paths are searched by ld(1)
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
>> Gueven Bay wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> NOTE: The patches are anonymously available to any nastiest persons in
>> the world, without any kind of authorization!
>> So where is the "legal difference" ??
>>
>
>
>From the little that I know of legal t
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Gueven Bay wrote:
[...]
NOTE: The patches are anonymously available to any nastiest persons in
the world, without any kind of authorization!
So where is the "legal difference" ??
From the little that I know of legal terms, the "Right To Use" and
"Right To Re-di
Gueven Bay wrote:
You know Mr Casper,
My question is still not answered, yet.
Even if the mentioned libraries are Visual Basic libs, this does not matter.
But what matter is the qeustion: How and what exactly the existing
distributions are distributing -aka giving away, giving to the users- if
Thank you bochnig for the elaborate answer.
It is now clearer to me.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Boyd Adamson wrote:
The global priorities are what is used by the scheduler to decide what
to do in the disp() function. Each class provides a mapping from user
to global priorities. I'm not aware, off the top of my head, of a way
to manipulate the global priorities directly.
If you just wa
The only "computer" I use that has OS/2 on it is a cash machine ;-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Better still:
#!/bin/sh
echo ""
echo "Your NICs should already be DHCP - configured now."
echo "Otherwise quit via ^C and run /bin/net-up first."
echo ""
echo "Continuing in 5 seconds ... "
echo ""
sleep 5
##/bin/net-up
mkdir /tmp/readwrite/libs.tmp
cd /tmp/readwrite/libs.tmp
wget http://patc
Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
>#!/bin/sh
>
>echo ""
>echo "Your NICs should already be DHCP - configured now."
>echo "Otherwise quit via ^C and run /bin/net-up first."
>echo ""
>echo "Continuing in 5 seconds ... "
>echo ""
>sleep 5
>
>##/bin/net-up
>
>mkdir /tmp/readwrite/libs.tmp
>cd /tmp/readwrite/lib
Gueven Bay wrote:
>You know Mr Casper,
>
>My question is still not answered, yet.
>
>Even if the mentioned libraries are Visual Basic libs, this does not matter.
>But what matter is the qeustion: How and what exactly the existing
>distributions are distributing -aka giving away, giving to the use
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Tom Marble wrote:
>> I find that the only libs required for Java (for the purposes of addressing
>> the DLJ concerns in this thread) are:
>> libCrun.so.1
>> libdemangle.so.1
>
> Are you saying, SUNW should not make the other 3 libC* libs
> redistributable at all ???
Not at
You know Mr Casper,
My question is still not answered, yet.
Even if the mentioned libraries are Visual Basic libs, this does not matter.
But what matter is the qeustion: How and what exactly the existing
distributions are distributing -aka giving away, giving to the users- if the
system libs ar
Tom Marble wrote:
>Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
>
>>Tom Marble wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I find that the only libs required for Java (for the purposes of addressing
>>>the DLJ concerns in this thread) are:
>>>libCrun.so.1
>>>libdemangle.so.1
>>>
>>>
>>Are you saying, SUNW should not make the other 3
>
> I installed it yesterday, along with snv_47. Worked like a champ
> so far. I haven't installed the VM tools package yet on that
> machine, but I would expect that the mouse/video will work as
> usual (with the same video workarounds).
>
Thank you very much you Large Geek you. :-) er Geek
Thank you so much for everyone's input.
I was just able to successfully compile sysbench (hurray).
What I did was:
# Removed the current sysbench source directory
rm -r -f sysbench-0.4.7
# Extracted a fresh copy from the tarball.
tar -xf sysbench-0.4.7.tar
# Changed my pwd to sysbench-0.4.7
cd s
Tom Marble wrote:
>All:
>
>I did the following analysis of Java SE 5.0 and found the following:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10% pwd
>/usr/local/java/jdk1.5.0_07/jre/lib/sparc
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11% foreach f (`find . -name '*.so'`)
>foreach? ldd $f >> /tmp/javalibs.txt
>foreach? echo $f
>foreach? end
>
>
All:
I did the following analysis of Java SE 5.0 and found the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10% pwd
/usr/local/java/jdk1.5.0_07/jre/lib/sparc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11% foreach f (`find . -name '*.so'`)
foreach? ldd $f >> /tmp/javalibs.txt
foreach? echo $f
foreach? end
Then, by examining the output o
Spencer Shepler writes:
> > How does this project align with ZFS and the rest of our storage
> > offerings?
>
> NFSv4.1's pNFS feature set can use an OSD target as a data store (as
> well as a "files" base data store and a block based data store).
> In fact, one might argue that in the pNFS contex
I installed it yesterday, along with snv_47. Worked like a champ
so far. I haven't installed the VM tools package yet on that
machine, but I would expect that the mouse/video will work as
usual (with the same video workarounds).
bill.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
There is a new release of VMWare Wo
> I believe I have a working scratch install of S10u2 on my new server
> box, but when I boot it, after relatively few seconds I get a message
> on the screen that X login screen is coming and I should wait for it.
> Then the screen blanks, and I cannot talk to the system through the
> keyboard aga
Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> _
> Simon Phipps, Chief Open Source Officer, Sun Microsystems
> Tel: +1 650 352 6327/USx69758 Web: www.webmink.net, AIM: webmink
> Current timezone: UTC+1 (UK)
>
>
>
[...]
The libC stuff is listed on the roadmap page, so it is a known thing:
http://w
_
Simon Phipps, Chief Open Source Officer, Sun Microsystems
Tel: +1 650 352 6327/USx69758 Web: www.webmink.net, AIM: webmink
Current timezone: UTC+1 (UK)
On Sep 8, 2006, at 08:43, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Moinak Ghosh wrote On 09/07/06 01:32,:
Martin Bochnig wro
>If the opsol libc is not redistributable how do the actual existing opsol
>distros
>do it? What is Belenix doing? What is Schillix using?
>
>Did they port the gnu libc to OpenSolaris? Did they port the BSD libc to opsol?
libC not libc.
Casper
___
o
Hugh McIntyre wrote:
> Gueven Bay wrote:
>
>> How can someone distribute an operating system without the c library?
>
>
> This is the C++ library, not C.
>
> Hugh.
Despite the fact, that somebody else made that mistake/confusion (and
that it is good that you corrected that error, so I don't n
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
>Moinak Ghosh wrote On 09/07/06 01:32,:
>
>
>>Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>David Comay wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you brought up
the DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the appropriate foru
On Thu, James Carlson wrote:
> Cyril Plisko writes:
> > > The T10 OSD model provides a number of advantages over the aging
> > > block-based
> > > storage model in areas such as performance, scalability, and security.
> > > Storage
> > > vendors are currently developing storage devices that suppo
Gueven Bay wrote:
How can someone distribute an operating system without the c library?
This is the C++ library, not C.
Hugh.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
If the opsol libc is not redistributable how do the actual existing opsol
distros
do it? What is Belenix doing? What is Schillix using?
Did they port the gnu libc to OpenSolaris? Did they port the BSD libc to opsol?
How can someone distribute an operating system without the c library?
I would b
44 matches
Mail list logo
