Gary Pennington wrote:
> I'd like to propose the creation of a project to direct the
> development of the software associated with the operation
> of the opensolaris.org website.
>
> The primary goal of the project is to provide a vehicle for
> opensolaris contributors to participate in the evoluti
So does the issue still stem from the 'choice of venue' listed under section 9?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
And BTW: I am sure, Simon did exactly have this in mind when he did
say that
the biggest problem for a DTrace port to Linux would be the
different threading
model and not the different licenses.
I felt a direct argument with Danese would h
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> rumour has it that this is re-spun ?
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/flag-days/pages/2006081201/
>
Thanks !
dc
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dennis Clarke wrote:
rumour has it that this is re-spun ?
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/flag-days/pages/2006081201/
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
___
rumour has it that this is re-spun ?
Issues Resolved:
BUG/RFE:6311077Enabling ON compilation with Sun Studio 11 (Venus)
Files changed:
update: usr/src/Makefile.master
update: usr/src/lib/gss_mechs/mech_krb5/Makefile.com
update: usr/src/lib/gss_mechs/mech_krb5/sparc/Makefile
update: usr/src/lib/gs
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 21:18 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> Re:
>
> Issues Resolved: no comment
> Files changed: delete: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ipf/radix.h
>
>
> what happened there ?
Also, would be nice to implement: when I click on the link of changed
file (marked as "update:") to see uni
Re:
Issues Resolved: no comment
Files changed: delete: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ipf/radix.h
what happened there ?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reviewing the new star man page and noted a number of
> significant enhancements. See http://www.blastwave.org/man/star.html
A formatted version is on http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/man/star.html
The archive format description
To answer the original question, no the fonts are still borked on SXCR build 45.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ALL :
I have been reviewing the new star man page and noted a number of
significant enhancements. See http://www.blastwave.org/man/star.html
I am testing this new star with ZFS and with UFS. Thus far it seems
to backup _everything_ flawlessly on UFS. Fast too.
I am still checking
Yup, I guessed that from the two messages.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[...]
> distribution and its name. Polaris was coined as a name for the project.
> It is the same thing as various project's names Sun is using internally
> and recently externally. (example: the 64 bit port of Solaris was
> named project Wayoming)
>
> At this point we are so far from working syst
Original-Message
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:12:22 -0400
From: Raquel Velasco and Bill Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Open Solaris
Subject: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris on Power
> Hi, given the press lately from IBM on OpenSolaris it seems the
> moment to release the code for Power
> On 8/18/06, Raquel Velasco and Bill Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, given the press lately from IBM on OpenSolaris it seems the
>> moment to release the code for Power and call it simply what it is:
>> OpenSolaris on Power. We have supported the diligent effort of Sun
>> Labs and enthusi
Gary Pennington wrote:
I'd like to propose the creation of a project to direct the
development of the software associated with the operation
of the opensolaris.org website.
The primary goal of the project is to provide a vehicle for
opensolaris contributors to participate in the evolution
of the
On 8/18/06, Raquel Velasco and Bill Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, given the press lately from IBM on OpenSolaris it seems the
moment to release the code for Power and call it simply what it is:
OpenSolaris on Power. We have supported the diligent effort of Sun
Labs and enthusiastic prepara
Hi Rich, that is flattering, but from our perspective OpenSolaris for
Power or more formally OpenSolaris on Power Architecture Technology
(as per the branding requirements), or perhaps just OpenSolaris -
Power (oh yeah!) gets those three main words together to define the
simple but profound
Sorry, that should be copy /usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts/F3bitmaps/fonts.alias.all
over to
/usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts/F3bitmaps/fonts.alias
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello Moinak,
Friday, August 18, 2006, 9:23:34 AM, you wrote:
MG> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello Ying,
>>
>> [...]
>> YKC> Anyone have the experience of install mysql of oracle on zfs?
>>
>> Both. Works ok, remember to set recordsize property on fs with data
>> files.
>>
>> However I haven't be
* Gary Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-18 10:40]:
> I'd like to propose the creation of a project to direct the
> development of the software associated with the operation
> of the opensolaris.org website.
>
> The primary goal of the project is to provide a vehicle for
> opensolaris contri
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Raquel Velasco and Bill Buck wrote:
> Hi, given the press lately from IBM on OpenSolaris it seems the moment to
> release the code for Power and call it simply what it is: OpenSolaris on
> Power. We have supported the diligent effort of Sun Labs and enthusiastic
> preparatory
[...]
> > boost the BSDs and MacOS
>
> Now - just what is the point of the MacOS core now?
> I can't imagine why Apple ported DTrace to their
> crufty multi-layered kernel. I would have thought
> it cleaner all round to pop the userspace onto
> Solaris - they'd find their stuff an easier sell to
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Don Armstrong, he provided you with a list of items to be
> answered in regard to your code, but they were never answered. Until you
> answer his questions, he will not reply. I don't know what transpired with
> Don Armstrong and you, but fr
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 18 August 2006 03:38 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > While he is the only person from Debian who did not send obviously wrong
> > claims about the GPL (as I already noted, the typical habbit of Debian
> > people was to send quotes from GPL §2 and t
On Friday 18 August 2006 03:38 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> While he is the only person from Debian who did not send obviously wrong
> claims about the GPL (as I already noted, the typical habbit of Debian
> people was to send quotes from GPL §2 and to claim that they were talking
> about GPL §3 or
I'd like to propose the creation of a project to direct the
development of the software associated with the operation
of the opensolaris.org website.
The primary goal of the project is to provide a vehicle for
opensolaris contributors to participate in the evolution
of the opensolaris website. New
James Carlson wrote:
Padraig O'Briain writes:
I am running Nevada build 43 and when I pass a hex string to strtod it is not
recognized as a float value.
According to the man page for strtod this means that libc is an ISO/IEC 9899:
1900 standard-compliant library.
Is there an intention to
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Though as noted earlier, I agree this dispute is much more about cdrtools
> than about CDDL in general.]
I noted alredy several times that this dispute is not limited to cdrtools.
Star has been attacked at the same time as cdrtools.
Jörg
--
EMa
Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Things are back to normal now. File attachments should be working
> >> again. Sorry for the downtime...
> >
> > Some files seem to miss. In special some files that have been
> > announced by a global Sun mail from today:
> >
> > http://www.opensola
Hi, given the press lately from IBM on OpenSolaris it seems the
moment to release the code for Power and call it simply what it is:
OpenSolaris on Power. We have supported the diligent effort of Sun
Labs and enthusiastic preparatory Blastware ambitions for over a
year. Polaris has been the
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Hurst wrote:
> > Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
> > CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
> > license is non-free and "illegal" (not GPL compatible).
>
> They are not saying CDDL is
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember a long (several hours) discussion with Andy Tucker in September
> 2004.
> The results at that time have been:
>
> - It must not be the BSDl as the Solaris developers don't like this.
>
> - It cannot be the GPL because this would prev
I don't think closed forks are necessarily something to lose too much sleep
over. Most code that's written is never used outside of the organisation its
written in and GPL doesn't enforce it - contribution of changes back is a
self-interest thing that's motivated by laziness with respect to mai
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 August 2006 03:45 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > After viewing the video from Debconf6, I can say the following:
>
> I did watch this video a couple days ago. Ironically, Don Armstrong (I only
> knew him as Don in the video) was at the Debi
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Ying,
[...]
YKC> Anyone have the experience of install mysql of oracle on zfs?
Both. Works ok, remember to set recordsize property on fs with data
files.
However I haven't benchmarked it.
On a related note, does it make any sense to look at extending
Postgre
36 matches
Mail list logo
