On Jun 16, 2006, at 7:08 PM, James Carlson wrote:
I'm a bit confused about what you want. Achieving those standards
means a high degree of attention to detail. It's not just grabbing
the latest and greatest source, typing 'make', and tossing it over a
wall. There's a _large_ amount of work t
>I've just (live) upgraded from build 36 to build 41 and I have a couple
>of observations:
>
>The nVidia driver in the source BE still gets mucked up.
>
>The machine is now a brick. Must be a ZFS change, I see
>
>cannot mount '/export/home1': directory is not empty
No, this is a liveupgrade bug;
>Steven Sim wrote:
>> Hello;
>>
>> I frequently conduct the following operation;
>>
>> #ufsdump 0f - | (cd /mnt; ufsrestore xf -)
>>
>> I have noticed that the above takes place so much slower in single user
>> mode than in multi user mode.
>>
>> A newfs operation on a local block device is
Richard Lowe wrote:
> Ian Collins wrote:
>
>> I've just (live) upgraded from build 36 to build 41 and I have a couple
>> of observations:
>>
>> The nVidia driver in the source BE still gets mucked up.
>>
>> The machine is now a brick. Must be a ZFS change, I see
>>
>> cannot mount '/export/home1'
Nice job to the Nexenta team...
only a couple of comments:
- After finishing the download of packages, it prompted me to switch
into single user. I said "Yes", but it continued with the upgrade in
multi-user anyway.
- Upon booting, I see the new 20060615 (b42) kernel (yay!), but the asy
drive
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, David J. Orman wrote:
> > Yes it does. Have you not heard of Blastwave.org?
>
> Rich, I have a lot of respect for you, did half of my email get cut off?
Only by my overly tired and hurried brain, for which I apologise. :-/
> Blastwave doesn't do it for me, simply because
Richard Lowe writes:
> Live upgrade will create directories for all mount points, even those
> under other mount points. ZFS will not mount over a non-empty directory.
>
> Removing the spurious directories should take care of that.
Yep. This is CR 6376420.
--
James Carlson, KISS Network
David J. Orman writes:
> With developers who can make such amazing things as ZFS/Dtrace/etc,
> why is it SO hard to pick a package format, setup some guidelines
> and routines
> , setup a maintenence schedule (updates/new features and
> bug/security fixes), and start work. The community could easi
On 6/16/06, Stephen Harpster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are your complaints that the open source software we have is old, or is your
complaint about how an administrator goes about keeping software up to date?
In build 41 you'll see we've brought Gnome up to 2.14. A lot of the apps have
been
> Hmmm... Blastwave isn't the only wget (and therefore pkg-get)
> service around. :) Steve Christensen's SunFreeware site
> (http://www.sunfreeware.com) has been around for 14 years, and
> also supports pkg-get access.
Used it too. :) Thanks for mentioning another excellent tool.
> Not speakin
Ian Collins wrote:
I've just (live) upgraded from build 36 to build 41 and I have a couple
of observations:
The nVidia driver in the source BE still gets mucked up.
The machine is now a brick. Must be a ZFS change, I see
cannot mount '/export/home1': directory is not empty
followed by an exp
I've just (live) upgraded from build 36 to build 41 and I have a couple
of observations:
The nVidia driver in the source BE still gets mucked up.
The machine is now a brick. Must be a ZFS change, I see
cannot mount '/export/home1': directory is not empty
followed by an explanation of the fix
Hmmm... Blastwave isn't the only wget (and therefore pkg-get)
service around. :) Steve Christensen's SunFreeware site
(http://www.sunfreeware.com) has been around for 14 years, and
also supports pkg-get access.
Not speaking in any way for Sun, but I *like* having these
folks managing the OSS
This month at the Silicon Valley OpenSolaris user group we have Josh Berkus
speaking on the Postgres database and how it relates to Solaris/OpenSolaris.
Postgres has been added into Solaris/OpenSolaris, which some folks are not
aware of yet. It is now included in both Solaris and OpenSolaris. Yo
NexentaOS build42 available in "elatte-unstable" APT repository now.
This is first time we are trying to utilize Nexenta Live Upgrades for ON
core packages.
I took some screenshots of the process here:
http://www.gnusolaris.org/gswiki/ErastBenson/Core_Upgrades
Erast
On Thu, 2006-
Steven Sim wrote:
Hello;
I frequently conduct the following operation;
#ufsdump 0f - | (cd /mnt; ufsrestore xf -)
I have noticed that the above takes place so much slower in single user
mode than in multi user mode.
A newfs operation on a local block device is also much slower in single
u
> Yes it does. Have you not heard of Blastwave.org?
Rich, I have a lot of respect for you, did half of my email get cut off?
"Blastwave fills this void pretty well, but it's not Sun supported." <-- one of
the points made.
Also, in my original mail:
"Now, I run Solaris on my servers. Guess wha
> Are your complaints that the open source software
> we have is old, or is your complaint about how an
> administrator goes about keeping software up to
> date?
>
> In build 41 you'll see we've brought Gnome up to
> 2.14. A lot of the apps have been
> updated as well. Steve Christensen has also
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, David J. Orman wrote:
> So, I can click a button/type a command, and have Solaris install mysql
> 5.0.22, the latest/least buggy/most secure version of postgresql, latest/most
> stable/etc apache, php 5, all the php5 modules I want, etc.
OKayyy.
> If I can't, then Sola
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Harpster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:30 am
Subject: [osol-discuss] Re: revisiting software issues
> Are your complaints that the open source software we have is
> old, or is your complaint about how an administrator goes about
> k
Are your complaints that the open source software we have is old, or is your
complaint about how an administrator goes about keeping software up to date?
In build 41 you'll see we've brought Gnome up to 2.14. A lot of the apps have
been
updated as well. Steve Christensen has also been working
I tried installing snv_41 to produce the requested scanpci output, and lo and
behold my HP nc6230 laptop booted up properly right from the DVD! Looking at
the bug list, I see that bug 6401605 is marked as fixed, and I'd tend to agree.
This is great - I'm back in business with Solaris on my HP la
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:51:31AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Philip Brown wrote:
> > actually, it isnt all that great in non-tunnel mode either. We couldnt get
> > it working between solaris 9 and windows xp servers, fyi.
> >
> > I'd like to see THAT be 100% interoperable first, personally.
Well, it's been a month or two since the last time I brought this up, but I've
seen no progress being made or even further discussion concerning the issues I
raised originally. Is it possible we could get a status report, as I'm hopeful
Sun *is* working on this.
Basically, I've sent in mails fr
> I wonder if the people at Microsoft will port MSIE 7
> to Solaris. Don't
> laugh. The penetration of MSIE 7 into the user space
> will be huge and
> having it on Solaris would be a win.
At one time Microsoft would not support the Amiga platform, at that time the #1
home, multimedia and person
> Hear, hear!
>
> Or, how about a Java version? Write once, run
> anywhere, and all that jazz...
NOW THERE is a perfectly good and fast way to make an application run like crap.
Java! Only ASP.NET is worse...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Hello;
I frequently conduct the following operation;
#ufsdump 0f - | (cd /mnt; ufsrestore xf -)
I have noticed that the above takes place so much slower in single user
mode than in multi user mode.
A newfs operation on a local block device is also much slower in single
user mode than in ru
Once it is enabled:
STATE STIMEFMRI
online 19:44:05 svc:/application/smcwbem:default
19:44:05 1199 smcboot
19:44:05 1200 smcboot
19:44:05 1201 smcboot
But I am getting the same error message once it is started as posted
Lovely Article --thanks to Sun PR team!
LKR
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all:
Yesterday Chris Ratcliffe and Stephen Harpster met with Timothy
Prickett-Morgan of IT Jungle on the record, to discuss the OpenSolaris
one-year anniversary.
Below please find the neutral to positive story as a resul
Solaris 9 (and higher) and Windows IKE definitely interoperate in Transport
Mode and there are many people who use this configuration routinely. There are
subtle configuration problems that can get people frustrated, however. These
SunSolve articles (which are very long due to Windows screensh
Philip Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Dan McDonald wrote:
Hello OpenSolaris folks!
I would like to open an OpenSolaris project - IPsec Tunnel Reform. Please
read on if you'd like to learn more about the project.
The IPsec implementation in Solaris interoperates very w
Hello Jan,
Thursday, April 13, 2006, 11:56:29 PM, you wrote:
>>
JSE> There's an (supposedly dangerously) hacked ata driver floating around
JSE> that makes this work OK. Please contact me off-line if you'd like a
JSE> copy of it. The bug that covers this is:
JSE> 5031379 Toshiba MK6021GAS fall
32 matches
Mail list logo
