Roland Mainz wrote:
>Hi!
>
>
>
>Is there somewhere a BugZilla[1] which can be used for OpenSolaris
>projects ? If there is no such installation - could genunix.org host
>such a beast ?
>
>[1]=I am asking explicitly for "BugZilla" for several reasons... please
>no "which-bugtracking-system-is-t
On 5/4/06, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure you know what I meant. What's been
> bothering me is that, most MB makers use the same
> embedded NIC, but the Solaris developers seem
> extremely persistent not to include the
> implementation (detection & installation) of this
> driv
Also what did the scanpci report?
Check the Asus web site
http://support.asus.com.tw/download/download.aspx?SLanguage=en-us
Contact there support to voice your opinions on using Solaris and would like
there Eng. to have evolvement with OpenSolaris!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Hi!
Is there somewhere a BugZilla[1] which can be used for OpenSolaris
projects ? If there is no such installation - could genunix.org host
such a beast ?
[1]=I am asking explicitly for "BugZilla" for several reasons... please
no "which-bugtracking-system-is-the-better-one"-flamewar...
--
Matty wrote:
>
>> I don't want to expand upon the issues I face with Solaris 10 (01/06),
>> considering the nastiness I received on the yahoo mailing list; lets
>> just say that compared to even Windows XP, the experience as a
>> workstation 'user' has been less than desirable - any attempt my me
Hey,
Matty wrote:
I don't want to expand upon the issues I face with Solaris 10 (01/06),
considering the nastiness I received on the yahoo mailing list; lets
just say that compared to even Windows XP, the experience as a
workstation 'user' has been less than desirable - any attempt my me in
th
Roland Mainz wrote:
>Ian Collins wrote:
>
>
>>>Does anyone know whether it is possible to use C99 features in a shared
>>>library which is used by older applications ?
>>>
>>>For example would it be possible to use C99 features such as |int
>>>getrpcbynumber(int arg1, /* ... */) { char buff[arg1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Grisanzio writes:
Regarding ARC cases ... two community members (Cyril Plisko, Robert
Milkowski) initiated ARC cases and participated in the review process.
Both have resulted in putbacks to OpenSolaris, and there is a third in
the works from Rich Teer.
To give
Thanks to Henry Grebler for this fix below and to Dan Groves for
sponsoring the work through to putback:
Putback 51
ID: 6414610
Desc: logadm should wait to run gzip
Submitted by Henry Grebler on 4/17/06
Sun Sponsor: Dan Groves
Putback to Nevada 40 5/1/06
Since we launched, 377 bugs have been re
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then doesn't that just make the CDDL the very GPL like ?
It would still allow people to use CDDLd sources together with any other
type of code.
> My understanding of the CDDL is that is as deliberately a file based
> license and as such the clause yo
Jim Grisanzio writes:
> Regarding ARC cases ... two community members (Cyril Plisko, Robert
> Milkowski) initiated ARC cases and participated in the review process.
> Both have resulted in putbacks to OpenSolaris, and there is a third in
> the works from Rich Teer.
To give appropriate credit
Dave Miner wrote:
Matty wrote:
I don't want to expand upon the issues I face with Solaris 10 (01/06),
considering the nastiness I received on the yahoo mailing list; lets
just say that compared to even Windows XP, the experience as a
workstation 'user' has been less than desirable - any attempt
On May 4, 2006, at 9:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also no safe way to remove the "[XXX]" stuff. I've asked
around
on IRC and the common warning is that this will break "Subject:"-
lines
in non-ASCII encodings.
Please simply leave the tags alone - IMO all the discussion turns
Roland Mainz wrote:
Well, the idea would be to have multiple Xservers per smart card.
There is non-smartcard session mobility which may be useful here - I
don't know enough about it to say. But this is still all off in
Sun Ray software area, not anything that can or should be done in
OpenSola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >+1... I agree... people who have problems with that should use local
> >filters to get rid of the [XXX] stuff if they do not like them. And for
> >Mozilla and Thunderbird there is always the method to employ CSS and/or
> >XSLT to do such stuff.
>
> People who like th
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > What do you mean with "coherent console support" ? Will SPARC (and maybe
> > even the SunRays) support multiple Xservers + multiple consoles ?
>
> This project is completely separate from Sun Ray, since a change like that
> would have to be in the
UNIX admin schrieb:
SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic 64-bit
Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All
rights reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Well, at least from the above we know that the kernel boots.
The rest appears to be a problem with one of the kernel (fs) modules.
W
Hi,
Roland Mainz wrote:
There is also no safe way to remove the "[XXX]" stuff. I've asked around
on IRC and the common warning is that this will break "Subject:"-lines
in non-ASCII encodings.
Please simply leave the tags alone - IMO all the discussion turns to the
point that the tag removal is b
Roland Mainzwrote:
What do you mean with "coherent console support" ? Will SPARC (and maybe
even the SunRays) support multiple Xservers + multiple consoles ?
This project is completely separate from Sun Ray, since a change like that
would have to be in the Sun Ray Server and/or Firmware, not an
On 5/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been subscribed to many lists without subject tags.
Oh, I hate subject tags too. But, the problem is that once the list
is created, it's not appropriate to remove the tags. Those types of
decisions should have been made when the lis
>+1... I agree... people who have problems with that should use local
>filters to get rid of the [XXX] stuff if they do not like them. And for
>Mozilla and Thunderbird there is always the method to employ CSS and/or
>XSLT to do such stuff.
People who like the tags should use local filters to add
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Riny Qian wrote:
> > The Virtual Console project would provide multiple consoles and
> > switch between Xserver and consoles for Solaris. There are two areas
> > of work envisioned:
> >
> > 1. Multiple consoles
> > 2. Switch between Xserver and consoles
> >
> > This projec
Riny Qian wrote:
> Chris Ricker wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Riny Qian wrote:
> >
> >
> >>We're just starting the investigation. And any ideas/comments are
> >>welcome! A project webpage for this project will be published soon.
> >
> >
> > Great, is this project going to be Sparc, x86, or both?
>There is also no safe way to remove the "[XXX]" stuff. I've asked around
>on IRC and the common warning is that this will break "Subject:"-lines
>in non-ASCII encodings.
>Please simply leave the tags alone - IMO all the discussion turns to the
>point that the tag removal is both unneccasary and e
Ian Collins wrote:
> >Does anyone know whether it is possible to use C99 features in a shared
> >library which is used by older applications ?
> >
> >For example would it be possible to use C99 features such as |int
> >getrpcbynumber(int arg1, /* ... */) { char buff[arg1]; /* ... */ }| in a
> >libr
Matty wrote:
I don't want to expand upon the issues I face with Solaris 10 (01/06),
considering the nastiness I received on the yahoo mailing list; lets
just say that compared to even Windows XP, the experience as a
workstation 'user' has been less than desirable - any attempt my me in
the past
On 5/2/06, Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, both FreeBSD and NetBSD currently use CVS for their projects and
while there are "known issues" with CVS, so far evaluations of other
tools (ie. SVN) have failed to produce compelling reasons to switch.
Almost all FreeBSD developers use th
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 14:57, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Please simply leave the tags alone - IMO all the discussion turns to the
> point that the tag removal is both unneccasary and even hazardous in
> some cases.
IMHO, it's tag insertion which is unnecessary. if mailman stops
inserting them, they'll
Glynn Foster wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > This only works for machine filtering but not when people put all emails
> > from opensolaris.org in one folder and then "scan" the subjects with
> > their human eyes for interesting postings.
>
> If you're making that argument, then you would be *much
James Dickens wrote:
> On 5/2/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/1/06, Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The best thing a list can do is to stick with whatever choice
> > > it makes when it is first created, for better or worse. The
> > > worst you can do is to de
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> On 5/2/06, Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As one of those who dissented from the change, I think it's a great idea
> > to offer the subscribing user choice here.
>
> I had a brief write-up that detailed how to generally do this - but
> removed it before I
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 20:39, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > The tagging is enabled by default in the mailman configuation
> > intentionally. Think about it: If it is so bad - why did the mailman
> > people turn it "on" by default then ?
>
> if it's so good, why do many lists I'm
Glynn Foster wrote:
> Andrei Dorofeev wrote:
> >>Over in website-discuss, we've reached consensus that, for the site
> >>lists as a whole, the various "[foo-discuss]" tags should not be
> >>prepended to subject lines by default.
> >
> > For people (like me) who save all of their OpenSol
Rick McNeal wrote:
> I would like to propose the creation of a new project page for the iSCSI
> Target work. This would enable the community to gain early access to this
> project before integration into Solaris Nevada is complete.
>
> The project currently consists of:
> RFC3720 - iSCSI pro
Several days ago, I voted, thusly:
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 19:29, Andrei Dorofeev wrote:
What is the reason other people want to remove them?
- deals poorly with crossposting -- you get multiple tags in random
orders when threads hop lists.
* John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 12:02]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > A revised proposal has already been made:
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=35607謗
>
> This proposal seems to be
>
> Given that the [tags] are unordered and unpredictable in order,
>
> SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic 64-bit
> Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All
> rights reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
Well, at least from the above we know that the kernel boots. The rest appears
to be a problem with one of the kernel (fs) modules.
This message
> I am sure you know what I meant. What's been
> bothering me is that, most MB makers use the same
> embedded NIC, but the Solaris developers seem
> extremely persistent not to include the
> implementation (detection & installation) of this
> driver in the "official release" (whatever that
> means
I don't want to expand upon the issues I face with Solaris 10 (01/06),
considering the nastiness I received on the yahoo mailing list; lets
just say that compared to even Windows XP, the experience as a
workstation 'user' has been less than desirable - any attempt my me in
the past to raise thes
Hi,
can anyone comment what is Fujitsu's position to OpenSolaris? They also build
SPARC machines but currently cannot run Solaris Nevada.
I was curious because I saw populated directories in
.../platform/sun4us
.../platform/FJSV,GPUSK
.../platform/FJSV,GPUZC-L
etc.
so I tried booting snv_37 on a
My initial thoughts are:
1. add an escape character of some kind to insert a literal ':'
2. please make all pathnames use a consistent syntax
3. don't implement any special work arounds unless you know there are
users of the feature
4. dlopen("foo:bar", RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_FULLPATH)
This is r
Hi,
A little later than usual, here's OpenSolaris Weekly News #9. As always
feedback, or content [from the missing represented communities] welcome.
Sorry for the need to quote - I just can't seem to get Thunderbird to do
anything sensible since moving over from Evolution this week. If anyone
kno
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Holger Berger wrote:
Hello? I was talking about Mercurial support in other applications
such as source browsers, search engines, backup tools, ticket
generators, patch signers, splicers, bot and daemon support (for
generating RSS feeds, commit emails, firewall and proxy sup
This will be great. Thanks Rick.
+1
Adam
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 07:45:52AM -0700, Rick McNeal wrote:
> I would like to propose the creation of a new project page for the iSCSI
> Target work. This would enable the community to gain early access to this
> project before integration into Solaris
Hi,
A little later than usual, here's OpenSolaris Weekly News #9. As always
feedback, or content [from the missing represented communities] welcome.
Sorry for the need to quote - I just can't seem to get Thunderbird to do
anything sensible since moving over from Evolution this week. If anyone
Hi,
A little later than usual, here's OpenSolaris Weekly News #9. As always
feedback, or content [from the missing represented communities] welcome.
Sorry for the need to quote - I just can't seem to get Thunderbird to do
anything sensible since moving over from Evolution this week. If anyone
kno
Hey,
Andrei Dorofeev wrote:
Over in website-discuss, we've reached consensus that, for the site
lists as a whole, the various "[foo-discuss]" tags should not be
prepended to subject lines by default.
For people (like me) who save all of their OpenSolaris mail
in one file, having [] ta
Hi,
Roland Mainz wrote:
This only works for machine filtering but not when people put all emails
from opensolaris.org in one folder and then "scan" the subjects with
their human eyes for interesting postings.
If you're making that argument, then you would be *much* better removing
the tags fr
Hey,
John Plocher wrote:
It sounds like there have been several strong -1's voiced about this
proposal, which should (according to the proposed governance rules)
derail this change.
If there still is a strong desire for such behavior, then I propose
extending the per-user mailman preferences
Joerg Schilling wrote On 05/04/06 03:39,:
> Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>Does this mean that Sun will stop using TeamWare?
>>
>> It means that, for the development release, the ON consolidation will
>> stop using TeamWare. The other consolidations of Solaris and other
>> pro
Hi,
A little later than usual, here's OpenSolaris Weekly News #9. As always
feedback, or content [from the missing represented communities] welcome.
Sorry for the need to quote - I just can't seem to get Thunderbird to do
anything sensible since moving over from Evolution this week. If anyone
kno
Rick McNeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to propose the creation of a new project page for the
> iSCSI Target work. This would enable the community to gain early
> access to this project before integration into Solaris Nevada is
> complete.
>
> The project currently consists of: RFC3
On 5/4/06, Rick McNeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to propose the creation of a new project page for the iSCSI Target
work. This would enable the community to gain early access to this project
before integration into Solaris Nevada is complete.
The project currently consists of:
I would like to propose the creation of a new project page for the iSCSI Target
work. This would enable the community to gain early access to this project
before integration into Solaris Nevada is complete.
The project currently consists of:
RFC3720 - iSCSI protocol
SAM-3 -- SCSI archite
I'm trying to find a pci express scsi card (non SAS) that will work with
Solaris on an x2100. I'm looking for something without RAID support as I'll be
using zfs with the disks on it and also attaching tape drives. Sun's web page,
http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x2100/optioncards.jsp, lists t
The version you give in the URL
http://www.alistaircrooks.co.uk/src/netbsd-iscsi-20060416.tar.gz
works for me on Solaris 9 (UltraSPARC/Sun Blade 100) with the following caveats:
* had to replace -pthread with -D_REENTRANT in the Makefile
* had to replace -lpthread with -lthread -lpthread in the
On 5/4/06, Felix Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know the exact answer for the following question is "when its done"
- but maybe someone could be so nice and give me an estimate time
frame when Solaris 10 Update II will be released? Will that happen in
months, weeks or days?
--
Sun annouced
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 12:20 +0200, Felix Schulte wrote:
> Yeah, put my vote into the "no way" list, too. The softies who
> complain should learn to write their own filter scripts to cut out the
> tags and shouldn't harass the majority here with such proposals.
Quite right too... why make the defa
On 5/2/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/1/06, Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The best thing a list can do is to stick with whatever choice
> it makes when it is first created, for better or worse. The
> worst you can do is to decide to change the behaviour at
> som
On 5/2/06, Bill Rushmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Over in website-discuss, we've reached consensus
> that, for the site
> lists as a whole, the various "[foo-discuss]" tags
> should not be
> prepended to subject lines by default.
> Since opensolaris-discuss is the highest traffic
> a
I know the exact answer for the following question is "when its done"
- but maybe someone could be so nice and give me an estimate time
frame when Solaris 10 Update II will be released? Will that happen in
months, weeks or days?
--
_Felix Schulte
_|_|_ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dont understant your point, CDDL is mainly a file based license, that
> means you can use a CDDL licenced file inside your closed source project
> as long as you make every chance you made to that file available to the
> community, why would i,
Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does this mean that Sun will stop using TeamWare?
>
> It means that, for the development release, the ON consolidation will
> stop using TeamWare. The other consolidations of Solaris and other
> products are empowered to make independent tools cho
63 matches
Mail list logo
