On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:40:18PM -0700, changho.kim wrote:
> Solaris have tools to control service by system.
> That's called SMF
> This is important role of self healing but every solaris beginner
> have difficulty in input command by keyboard.
> if user don't familiar with keyboard, they want G
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 10:40 pm, changho.kim wrote:
> Solaris have tools to control service by system.
> That's called SMF
> This is important role of self healing but every solaris beginner have
> difficulty in input command by keyboard. if user don't familiar with
> keyboard, they want GUI prog
> Also, is there any thought of how broad a range of
> HPQ machines are affected by
> this issue?
As far as I know all the affected machines are built around an ATI Radeon PCI-E
chipset.
Regards,
J-F
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> Why is 6401605 no longer in the database?
Good question.
The FAQ says that it can be related to security considerations.
For info, the last time I saw the bug entry it was assigned.
Regards,
J-F
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
op
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 22:40 -0700, changho.kim wrote:
> Solaris have tools to control service by system.
> That's called SMF
> This is important role of self healing but every solaris beginner have
> difficulty in input command by keyboard.
> if user don't familiar with keyboard, they want GUI pro
Solaris have tools to control service by system.
That's called SMF
This is important role of self healing but every solaris beginner have
difficulty in input command by keyboard.
if user don't familiar with keyboard, they want GUI program.
So I propose this project
Make GUI SMF program!!
Have a n
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 02:19 -0300, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
> I think we should do what we do best, give away software, I know what
> I'm about to say is a bit impossible because of the time constraints,
> cost and others. Do we still have that band of brothers DVD? I was
> thinking about givi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sara Dornsife wrote:
> If we don't want to clog up this list with all of the MANY ideas that
> are going to stream in, we can move it over to the marketing list (cc'd
> here) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> And any ideas are welcome. I volunteer to compile th
Date: Wednesday, April 26
Time: 6:30pm
Location: Sun Solution (formally iForce) Centre. Ground floor 33 Berry
St, North Sydney
See http://opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups/sosug for a link
to a map.
Speakers
Brendan Gregg
Brendan will be speaking about the upcoming S
I recently installed Build 37 on an HP nx9600 laptop.
$ isainfo -v
64-bit amd64 applications
cx16 mon sse3 pause sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu
32-bit i386 applications
cx16 mon sse3 pause sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov sep cx8 tsc fpu
/usr/X11/bin/scanpci reports:
pci bus
I should clarify
6328841 is theoretically related however is not labeled as related,
according to bugzilla.
Also, is there any thought of how broad a range of HPQ machines are affected
by
this issue?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
o
Why is 6401605 no longer in the database?
It is related to:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6406183
Which also is related to.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6413401
6328841 is related and is still there.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase
I would recommend a 15" MacBook...Runs Solaris, OSX, Windows and some Linux
distro's. And it just passed second revision. I didn't think I ever needed osx
or windows until I had to do some video editing, unfortunately you need
proprietary software to do meaningful video production and OSX comes
Karyn Ritter wrote:
Sorry for the virtual cross-post...
The 1-year anniversary celebration is all about the great strides and
contributions the community has made over the past year. Start sending
out your ideas about what things the community can do to help celebrate
being open for a year. I
FYI... a message about requesting historical ARC cases was posted to
arc-discuss:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=8183&tstart=0
Comments appreciated (but please post them there, not here).
Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing li
When sending out announcements to the opensolaris announcements lists, could
people [b][i][u]please[/u][/i][/b] put intelligent, descriptive, and useful
descriptions into the announcements?
After getting the recent announcement for the "Companion project", I have no
clue as to what a "companion
If we don't want to clog up this list with all of the MANY ideas that
are going to stream in, we can move it over to the marketing list (cc'd
here) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And any ideas are welcome. I volunteer to compile the ideas that come in
and we can vote on them. Things like changes to the w
Sorry for the virtual cross-post...
The 1-year anniversary celebration is all about the great strides and
contributions the community has made over the past year. Start sending
out your ideas about what things the community can do to help celebrate
being open for a year. It's an opportunity fo
Erast Benson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 13:52 -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
Guys,
I were thinking on what would be beneficial for every camp involved
into
OpenSolaris and related development? What would be useful for
NexentaOS,
BeleniX, Schill
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 13:52 -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Moinak Ghosh wrote:
>
> >Erast Benson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Guys,
> >>
> >>I were thinking on what would be beneficial for every camp involved into
> >>OpenSolaris and related development? What would be useful for NexentaOS,
> >>BeleniX, Sc
John Downing wrote:
Does anyone know of any projects to port Solaris to ARM? It would be a great
embedded OS.
I know from discussion, part of the reason there's desire for a PowerPC
port is for embedded applications. So, there may be an embedded option
before too long-- just not ARM.
- Ma
Does anyone know of any projects to port Solaris to ARM? It would be a great
embedded OS.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
Guys,
I were thinking on what would be beneficial for every camp involved into
OpenSolaris and related development? What would be useful for NexentaOS,
BeleniX, SchilliX, marTux, SCXR, etc ?
I think having centralized place (bugzilla, bounty, project
Of course this add depends on your use and preference, but I'm partial to the
"wickedly fast" Ultra 20 and Ultra 40.
Perhaps even a Ultra 20 and a Ferrari for about $4k?
N1 grid engine is free so you could pool those two systems if you wanted.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> not sure if i want a laptop or desktop though. as
> far as laptops go the ferrari 4000 seems to be very
> popular. and i've been told that ASUS builds a nice
> laptop (i guess they make the powerbooks for apple).
> i think i want to stay away from the intel machines
> as i prefer AMDs and i wor
Joerg Schilling wrote:
As long as build systems that are coming from "other" OS
add patches that are not needed or counter-productive on
"our" OS, it does not help much.
Yeah, you hit the nail on the head when it comes to pkgsrc. In my work
with pkgsrc, I found this to be maybe the biggest
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Menno Lageman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed, setting it to 2 increases build time to almost 4 hours. I need
to take back my statement that increasing max jobs to 32 doesn't
decrease build time though (must have loked at the wrong logfile):
jobstime
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I myself would prefer open source software based on libraries already
included in Solaris (like OpenSSL) - something I can't get with
Blastwave.
This is something that currently does not fit the ON OSS model from Sun.
>Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As opposed to the millions of software developers that are writing the
>> millions of unaudited code that forms the base of your packages.
>> Sometimes 'good faith' is as much as you can hope for.
>
>Well, to be serious I did seee also code coming into
ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. What is being done currently with colleges,
> universities, and organizations?? Isn't NetBSD doing
> work in providing packages/ports to Solaris using the
> NetBSD build system?!?
As long as build systems that are coming from "other" OS
add patches that ar
Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As opposed to the millions of software developers that are writing the
> millions of unaudited code that forms the base of your packages.
> Sometimes 'good faith' is as much as you can hope for.
Well, to be serious I did seee also code coming into OpenSol
"Martin Schaffstall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Mailing list names should be descriptive and consists of more than one
> word. Famous examples for bad list names include
The question was whether this hackers list would really be limited to the
kernel as LKML is or whethe
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >And when it finds that certain /usr/sfw or more tightly integrated
> >bits need to be updated, this can be driven from the CCD community
> >directly...
> >
>
> +1.
>
> An up-to-date CCD (and JDS) drives an up-to-date SFW, which reduces
> (dramatically
Menno Lageman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed, setting it to 2 increases build time to almost 4 hours. I need
> to take back my statement that increasing max jobs to 32 doesn't
> decrease build time though (must have loked at the wrong logfile):
>
> jobstime
> 4 2:26
>
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I myself would prefer open source software based on libraries already
included in Solaris (like OpenSSL) - something I can't get with
Blastwave.
This is something that currently does not fit the ON OSS model from Sun.
Unless
Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I myself would prefer open source software based on libraries already
> included in Solaris (like OpenSSL) - something I can't get with
> Blastwave.
This is something that currently does not fit the ON OSS model from Sun.
Unless we find a way that Su
Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, blastwave packages are set up to be binary distributions, not
> developer distributions.
> If you want to compile other stuff against our packages, you are encouraged
> to become a maintainer and add to the collection, using our nice clean
> bui
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As others have pointed out, the root of the problem is that your current
> setup requires you to put your full trust in the maintainers of each package
> with no way to verify that they've not inserted a trojan horse into the build.
> That's the discus
Hi,
I have setup a siebel component called scs on a local zone. The application
gets installed fine and I can see it running and connecting to the database,
however I am unable to connect to this application i.e scs by using another tcl
application called java client from another machine (by pr
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 06:24, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The Solaris development process more or less rejects the notion of
> > trusted developers.
>
> ...
>
> > We emphasize control over *what* goes in, not *who* makes the change.
>
> How do you
Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Solaris development process more or less rejects the notion of
> trusted developers.
...
> We emphasize control over *what* goes in, not *who* makes the change.
How do you like to do this without trusted and skilled people?
Jörg
--
EMail:
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 4) No duplication/replacement of libraries already
> >>present in the target Solaris release.
>
> Also super tough given the multiple versions of Solaris to be
> supported. It may simply be a case where there will be multiple
> trees of softw
Stefan Parvu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>uname -a
> SunOS earth 5.11 snv_36 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>which find
> /usr/bin/find
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>man find
> [...]
> -mmin n File's data was last modified n minutes ago.
Sorry - but I don't like this
The SPARC chips from Fujitsu will be binary and source compatible with
the SPARC chips from Sun. So I don't see an issue.
Darren
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
44 matches
Mail list logo
