Hmmm... Has anyone tried doing the install from within
VMware? You can give VMware access to a physical disk
or partition. That should at least get through the install
from the CD to an "installed" disk partition.
Getting through the grub magic and/or whatever stuff the mac
uses for boot mana
* Holger Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-07 18:12]:
> On 4/8/06, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Commentary is encouraged. We can start to look at specific
> > > SCM-dependent tools next week, unless we are more distant from
I cant seem to get past stage 2 on grub either.
also note that the mac detects the solaris cd as a windows partition, what is
going on here?
not giving up yet...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolar
Holger Berger wrote:
May I ask whether this decision is wise? What is the background to
prefer Mercurial over bit keeper, git or subversion?
Please read the full body of the evaluations which explain exactly
why this decision was made (they were posted to tools-discuss, not
the full opensolaris
On 4/8/06, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> >
> > Commentary is encouraged. We can start to look at specific
> > SCM-dependent tools next week, unless we are more distant from
> > consensus that I believe...
> >
> > Enjoy the weekend; my th
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> Commentary is encouraged. We can start to look at specific
> SCM-dependent tools next week, unless we are more distant from
> consensus that I believe...
>
> Enjoy the weekend; my thanks to all.
... snip
> Therefore, we have decided to
Ian Collins wrote:
Just curious, has anyone timed a build on a T2000? I'm interested in
how well one these works as a build system.
I haven't. Unfortunately, the only T2000s we have at work are being
used for certification and performance testing purposes right now. I
might see if I can pr
[http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6058894.h
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: Gw3Zx
X-OpenSolaris-URL:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=31576&tstart=0#31576
Is this q
Stephen Potter wrote:
>I just put together an AMD X2-3800+ system (low end dual core), cost me less
>than $700 total I think because of some good deals. Just did my first nightly
>in 1:15:01.
>
>For pricing proc was $300, ASRock MB was $65 (onboard shared video works
>great, still haven't gott
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:46:42AM -0700, J?rgen Keil wrote:
> The recently released on-20060404 release has added "gcc" shadow
> compilation, and it seems a lot (all?) files are now compiled four times
> (debug i386 & amd64 using Sun cc; + debug i386 & amd64 using gcc).
Not quite. Most C and C
On 4/7/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I. Szczesniak writes:
> > I just finished reading
> > http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6058894.html - are any people
> > working on Opensolaris affected by these layoffs?
>
> Just what exactly are you expecting to hear on an open list like thi
On 4/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is there a technical reason why UFS logging cannot be used together
> >with the fastfs option?
>
> It's asynchronous writes and logging is "sycnhronous" in some way
> in nature. What's the point of "unsafe" logging?
You could employ writ
I. Szczesniak writes:
> I just finished reading
> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6058894.html - are any people
> working on Opensolaris affected by these layoffs?
Just what exactly are you expecting to hear on an open list like this?
Open Solaris is one thing, but personnel and finance matter
>Is there a technical reason why UFS logging cannot be used together
>with the fastfs option?
It's asynchronous writes and logging is "sycnhronous" in some way
in nature. What's the point of "unsafe" logging?
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing lis
Is there a technical reason why UFS logging cannot be used together
with the fastfs option?
Irek
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I just finished reading
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6058894.html - are any people
working on Opensolaris affected by these layoffs?
Irek
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
We have some hardware that has had similar problems. It may be that the
A20 is actually enabled anyway. You might want to just do a return in
the gateA20. We do:
ENTRY(gateA20)
movb$2, %al
outb$0x92
ret
but you could always just try returning ;-)
this is in s
I second this project.
Anup
Nicolas Williams wrote on 04/07/06 10:07:
The goal of Project RENO [0] is to facilitate interoperability with
Active Directory (see project WINCHESTER [1]), as well as with any
directory that requires "self-credentialed" lookups [2] for information
relevant to the l
Jürgen Keil wrote:
It came up with the usual loading Stage 2but got
no further, so at least it reads the DVD and tries to
boot from it.
It hangs in GRUB's gateA20() subroutine, called from
usr/src/grub/grub-0.95/stage2/common.c function init_bios_info(), here:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/
> It came up with the usual loading Stage 2but got
> no further, so at least it reads the DVD and tries to
> boot from it.
It hangs in GRUB's gateA20() subroutine, called from
usr/src/grub/grub-0.95/stage2/common.c function init_bios_info(), here:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/us
Nicolas Williams wrote:
The goal of Project RENO [0] is to facilitate interoperability with
Active Directory (see project WINCHESTER [1]), as well as with any
directory that requires "self-credentialed" lookups [2] for information
relevant to the login process, and the DCE model of distributing s
The goal of Project RENO [0] is to facilitate interoperability with
Active Directory (see project WINCHESTER [1]), as well as with any
directory that requires "self-credentialed" lookups [2] for information
relevant to the login process, and the DCE model of distributing such
information with authe
> I've had much more success, sadly, with RHEL4 but it isn't using GRUB
> but lilo on the CD image.
A Windows ME 1.44MB boot floppy image is bootable, when you write that as an
El-Torito bootable CD (1.44MB bootable floppy image).
> The kernel loads and it enters the installer
> but either it i
> Which "on-src" release are your building, which
> SUNWonbld tools are you using?
Good point, that would be fair to say...
March 27th releases, with Studio 10, not GCC.
-spp
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Well, I've got Solaris 10 running on my Imac, after a fashion. I used the very
recently announced Virtualisation software from Parallels (www.parallels.com),
using their trial version.
You basically create a virtual machine and point it at an ISO and tell it to
boot from that. I had the origin
> I just put together an AMD X2-3800+ system (low end
> dual core), ... Just did my first nightly in 1:15:01.
When comparing opensolaris build times.
Which "on-src" release are your building, which SUNWonbld tools are you using?
The recently released on-20060404 release has added "gcc" sh
On 4/6/06, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyway i wanted to do a clean install this time around. i think i screwed up
> the first installs partition table -- i don't think i completely got rid of
> the export/home partition. this time i got i right-- swap and one big /
> partition. but
27 matches
Mail list logo
