On 3/2/06, Andy Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Bill Rushmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There is also another way to get OpenSolaris to almost everyone's hands
> > > which I have been advocating. That is with VMware (Vir
> Hi
>
> Just like to ask before running to shop.
> Reading HCL list did not help much.
>
> So does current intel/amd builds ( specially
> interested latest express ) has support for
> ASUS VINTAGE AE-1 model Barebone PC chipsets and
> devices ?
> Details :
> http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?l
On 3/2/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Bill Rushmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is also another way to get OpenSolaris to almost everyone's hands
> > which I have been advocating. That is with VMware (Virtual PC works too,
> > but not as good). Once people star
On 3/2/06, Bill Rushmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
>
> There is also another way to get OpenSolaris to almost everyone's hands
> which I have been advocating. That is with VMware (Virtual PC works too,
> but not as good). Once people start using it, th
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:52:09AM +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Are the sources of the Solaris libusb wrapper implementation
available anywhere or if not, is there a plan to release them
sometime ?
libusb and libusbugen are in the SFW consolidation. It's slated fo
Sunil Subrahmanyam wrote:
Hi,
I installed solaris 10 and everything ran fine for a month. I recently upgraded
memory on the server and when I rebooted, some of the services were put in the
maintenance mode.
Here is the solaris 10 release info:
bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 1/06 s10s_
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
This is my biggest complaint about Sun. This is a great company but
no one is (explicitly) told (or has a mechanism to be told) what you
guys (gender-neutral) are doing.
For this case, the bug is visible on bugs.opensolaris.org, was listed
in the
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
This is my biggest complaint about Sun. This is a great company but no one is
(explicitly) told (or has a mechanism to be told) what you guys
(gender-neutral) are doing.
There's almost 40,000 employees - how could we tell you what everyone's
doing? How would you find
>Now, instead of being told to "go to a certain web site to download
>the necessary NIC driver" (doe s anyone see a problem here?) we the
>mortals can be instructed to copy the driver from the DVD. As
>I reported in my post, all the necessary drivers are there. The issue
>is "inclusion" (& lack
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6377618
for details, but just noticed those are sorely lacking from
the bug report.>
This is my biggest complaint about Sun. This is a great company but no one is
(explicitly) told (or has a mechanism to be told)
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
When I installed Solaris 10.1 or SE on some of my machines, the video worked OK
during installation. But when the installation completes and system reboots, I
would lose my video.
That's a known issue being worked on - install uses Xsun,
the default after install is don
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Alan:
In making my previous statement, I was basing on the fact that:
When I installed Solaris 10.1 or SE on some of my machines, the video worked OK
during installation. But when the installation completes and system reboots, I
would lose my video.
After more caref
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
You're exactly right. I was talking about SuSE, not Solaris. But we will try
look into ATI's script to see whether we can do the same thing for Solaris. (I
am sure you or your colleagues will be able to do a much better job in a much
shorter time.)
We've already put
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
You're exactly right. I was talking about SuSE, not Solaris. But we will try
look into ATI's script to see whether we can do the same thing for Solaris. (I
am sure you or your colleagues will be able to do a much better job in a much
shorter time.)
We have a OpenSu
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
With regard to the video driver issue, ATI has written a script to replace the
mesa driver with their proprietary fglxr driver. This is something we will
look into.
What OS are you talking about? There is no ATI fglxr driver for Solaris,
only Linux.
--
-Alan
Casper wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 08:34:35PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> The BFU images should be included for the latest build.
Uh, why? BFUing ON build N over Solaris Express build N is a no-op
when it goes right and harmful otherwise; BFUing ON build N over some
other distribution is even more suspec
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 20:23 +0100, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > > Jim, could you please post the patch diffs (diff -u), too? That may be
> > > helpful to see what changed exactly.
Once a SCM is in place this transient problem should go away.
till then, (when the code is synced) you can search for the
Hi,
I installed solaris 10 and everything ran fine for a month. I recently upgraded
memory on the server and when I rebooted, some of the services were put in the
maintenance mode.
Here is the solaris 10 release info:
bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 1/06 s10s_u1wos_19a SPARC
Copyright 20
On Thu 02 Mar 2006 at 11:33AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> >
> >>It would be cool if the diffs would be part of the announcements.
> >
> >
> >The diffs are always attached to the bug ID in the bug database. They
> >don't appear on the bugs.opensolarig.org though. I don't
How would it determine which bugs those fields can be exported for?
We can't do it for all bugs, since some contain source which cannot
be disclosed publically.
It's not an unsolvable problem. E.g. there could be a special field
accessible only from Sun, that the sponsor would set.
-Artem.
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
It would be cool if the diffs would be part of the announcements.
The diffs are always attached to the bug ID in the bug database. They
don't appear on the bugs.opensolarig.org though. I don't see why they
shouldn't for contributed patches, perhaps it's just a tec
It would be cool if the diffs would be part of the announcements.
The diffs are always attached to the bug ID in the bug database. They
don't appear on the bugs.opensolarig.org though. I don't see why they
shouldn't for contributed patches, perhaps it's just a technical problem
with databas
On 3/2/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Schulte wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Thanks to Juergen Keil for this bug fix below and to Minskey Guo for
> >>sponsoring the fix through to putback:
> >>
> >>Putback #39
> >>ID: 6388096
> >>Desc: N
Felix Schulte wrote:
On 3/2/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to Juergen Keil for this bug fix below and to Minskey Guo for
sponsoring the fix through to putback:
Putback #39
ID: 6388096
Desc: NULL pointer dereference panic in sd_range_lock()
Submitted by Juergen Keil on 2/21
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:52:09AM +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Are the sources of the Solaris libusb wrapper implementation
available anywhere or if not, is there a plan to release them
sometime ?
libusb and libusbugen are in the SFW consolidation. It's sla
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:52:09AM +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> Are the sources of the Solaris libusb wrapper implementation
> available anywhere or if not, is there a plan to release them
> sometime ?
libusb and libusbugen are in the SFW consolidation. It's slated for
release "soon." Likely
On 3/2/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to Juergen Keil for this bug fix below and to Minskey Guo for
> sponsoring the fix through to putback:
>
> Putback #39
> ID: 6388096
> Desc: NULL pointer dereference panic in sd_range_lock()
> Submitted by Juergen Keil on 2/21/06
> Sun Sp
Thanks to Juergen Keil for this bug fix below and to Minskey Guo for
sponsoring the fix through to putback:
Putback #39
ID: 6388096
Desc: NULL pointer dereference panic in sd_range_lock()
Submitted by Juergen Keil on 2/21/06
Sun Sponsor: Minskey Guo
Putback to Nevada 36 on 3/2/0
>W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
>> This inadequacy IMNSHO has a lot to do with the relative lack of
>>attention paid to hardware driv ers in Sun's own official releases. I
>>keep five PCs (desktops and notebooks) in my little personal
>>lab. So far, without outside helps, I have not been able to make a
>
Eric Enright wrote:
There are three specific sets of drivers I would *love* to see
integrated to Solaris proper:
- nVidia's graphics driver
We're working on it. Unfortunately, nVidia's driver installs
a kernel module that manages the hardware, and thus conflicts
with Xsun's nvidia drivers if
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
This inadequacy IMNSHO has a lot to do with the relative lack of attention paid
to hardware drivers in Sun's own official releases. I keep five PCs (desktops
and notebooks) in my little personal lab. So far, without outside helps, I
have not been able to make a function
On 3/2/06, Bill Rushmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
>
> > Personally, I don't see how OpenSolaris could receive its deserved
> > attention (and respect) if no one outside the existing Solaris community
> > can install it.
>
>
> I have to strongly disagr
On 3/2/06, ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can also try Schillix 0.4.5 which is available
> from the main Schillix website:
>
> ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/SchilliX-0.4.5.iso.bz2
>
> or wait till Friday to get Schillix 0.5.
>
I guess I don't really ever sleep and thus I stay in tou
I totally agree--there are many good "messages" that come from producing
a multiboot DVD--and maybe it's something we do periodically in addition
to sep. Distros, or even as Glynn suggested tutorial and training
modules. Physical media is a beautiful thing once in a while to
complement the o
:) Love this project!
I'll check with Linux Format magazine to confirm deadline for ISOs and
documentation.
I expect posting ISOs by end of this week so they can do their
production work beginning next week would be best.
So yes, that's Dennis, locking the ISO quickly on Friday.
LKR
Erast
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> Personally, I don't see how OpenSolaris could receive its deserved attention
> (and respect) if no one outside the existing Solaris community can install it.
I have to strongly disagree with you there. Yes, the hardware doesn't
cover everything but t
You can also try Schillix 0.4.5 which is available
from the main Schillix website:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/SchilliX-0.4.5.iso.bz2
or wait till Friday to get Schillix 0.5.
I also think the idea of adding the additional
network, sound, video, and libusb device drivers
provide additional
On 3/2/06, W. Wayne Liauh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I don't see how OpenSolaris could receive its deserved attention
> (and respect) if no one outside the existing Solaris community can install it.
>
> This inadequacy IMNSHO has a lot to do with the relative lack of attention
> pai
39 matches
Mail list logo
