Sunil wrote:
why are closed bins available as debug mode only?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It's something that I'm spending some time on. It's getting there,
albei
Hi Sunil,
By default we always build both i386 and amd64. If you would like to
build i386 only, you can modify the following files this way:
--- usr/src/uts/i86pc/Makefile.i86pc ---
Index: usr/src/uts/i86pc/Makefile.i86pc
28c28
< # ident "@(#)Makefile.i86pc 1.124 05/06/08 S
So, I cap-eye-installed the kernel as kernel.mine and did reboot --
'kernel.mine/unix'. Panic with these errors:
reading beyond end of ramdisk
start=0x2000 size=0x2000
failed to read superblock
panic : can't mount boot
Now only thing I can boot is failsafe. Any
Hi Sunil,
If you would like to build amd64 with Studio 10 patch, and assuming
that you have installed Studio 10 patch, this is what you need to do
either in the environment setting, or in your environment file if you
are using the "nightly" script:
# export __GNUC64='#'
# export SPRO_VROOT=path-t
On 7/6/05, Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why are closed bins available as debug mode only?
>From the release notes:
"3. Non-DEBUG kernel builds have not been tested."
and posted by Mike Kupfer in this thread:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=2350рдо
"I don't have the inf
why are closed bins available as debug mode only?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
$ uname -p
i386
MACH is set to i386 as well. Why would I be doing an amd64 build?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 7/6/05, Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is the default build trying to use gcc? I am following the directions
> given in the dev. reference document. The only variable that affects the gcc
> usage is __GNUC which I have set promptly to '#' but no go. If I set CC=cc
> then it spews some
Why is the default build trying to use gcc? I am following the directions given
in the dev. reference document. The only variable that affects the gcc usage is
__GNUC which I have set promptly to '#' but no go. If I set CC=cc then it spews
some cc warnings:
-
cd usr/src/uts
Ok, ok, poor form.. Someone else answer the original question then - I
retract mine..
Al Hopper wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
I've read a pretty fair comparison of Linux 2.6 vs Solaris 10. I think I
originally got it off LinuxToday.com but just did a searc
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
> I've read a pretty fair comparison of Linux 2.6 vs Solaris 10. I think I
> originally got it off LinuxToday.com but just did a search and found a
> link to it on IBM's site... It actually looks at everything from
> technical differences, legal/licens
From a coding standpoint, this might almost qualify for oss-bite-size,
but since it changes the protocol and could involve bringing in new code
from BSD, it would also seem a good simple case for getting an introduction
to Sun's ARC and legal review processes.
-alan-
Original Me
I don't know if JDS sources have ever been under TW, or if JDS developers used
to use TW, but now decided to use CVS (which sounds strange to me :-).
Anyway, this is not a problem. We have created a TeamWare client for CVS.
This tool allows to use CVS repository as a "parent" workspace, so each
de
On 7/6/05, Chris Ricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/linux/pdfs/LinuxVersusSolarisAnalysis24Feb2005.pdf
>
> You might note who paid for that analysis. Like most such studies, it
> ends up supporting its sugar daddy -- no
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 7/6/05, Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I miss the most (from Gentoo system) is the ability to have access to
> > multiple vt's from console without having to login onto X. I know I can use
> > screen but its not quite as convenient as the v
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
> ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/linux/pdfs/LinuxVersusSolarisAnalysis24Feb2005.pdf
You might note who paid for that analysis. Like most such studies, it
ends up supporting its sugar daddy -- no real surprise there. The
technical inaccuracies in it (abo
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
> accurate. I tend to favor Linux too anyway (GPL is open source with
> freedom, CDDL is fake open source) and so does most of this industry
Care to explain your-anti CDDL FUD? CDDL is just as open source as
GPL, and gives developers MORE freedom tha
On 7/6/05, Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I miss the most (from Gentoo system) is the ability to have access to
> multiple vt's from console without having to login onto X. I know I can use
> screen but its not quite as convenient as the vt's since I can't really
> switch from X to cons
What I miss the most (from Gentoo system) is the ability to have access to
multiple vt's from console without having to login onto X. I know I can use
screen but its not quite as convenient as the vt's since I can't really switch
from X to console. Are there any possibilities there?
This message
On 7/6/05, Michael K Dolan Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've read a pretty fair comparison of Linux 2.6 vs Solaris 10. I think I
> originally got it off LinuxToday.com but just did a search and found a
> link to it on IBM's site... It actually looks at everything from
> technical differences, le
I've read a pretty fair comparison of Linux 2.6 vs Solaris 10. I think I
originally got it off LinuxToday.com but just did a search and found a
link to it on IBM's site... It actually looks at everything from
technical differences, legal/licensing, and ecosystems support. In the
end it comes ou
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Paul Walsh wrote:
>
> > I remember being told by the tutor on a Solaris SysAdmin course to
> > always choose "Entire distribution + OEM support" Nowadays I'm not so
>
> I think that's very poor advice.
In general, this is good advice...
> > sure. A system being set up as
Oracle is a company in category #2 and it has moved from solaris to linux. all
dev. machines are RHEL. the base platform where the first release happens is
linux. solaris is a product line, like MVS/VMS/HPUX/AIX. care to explain that?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
+1
-- richard
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
I've notices well known problem [1,2] after installing software sets from 1st
CD (as it is written in subject, Sun Express, Build 16). To make sure that my
images were downloaded properly, could someone put SHA1/MD5 hashes of those
files? My checksums are:
SHA1(sol-nv-b16-x86-v1-iso.zip)
Hey,
> A few months before I was in fear that it would be hard to have the same GUI
> as Sun Solaris, not that the sources are available I am encouraged.
So this is quite interesting, because no one's commented how the
branding will look for JDS under the opensolaris.org umbrella - would
people e
Heya,
> > I'd like to lead a desktop community focused on JDS. There's absolutely
> > no reason that others can't jump in with proposals to lead KDE, XFCE, or
> > other variants - in fact, I'd totally encourage anyone to do so!
>
> I did see recently that the JDS sources are available.
> What
Nikolay Molchanov wrote:
I'd like to ask if there is a recommended Code Management System for
OpenSolaris.
Solaris is shipped with "sccs" (/usr/ccs/bin/sccs), and inside Sun all Solaris
sources
are under SCCS.
Many Solaris sources, but no longer all, since TeamWare was declared
"dead" a few
Nikolay Molchanov wrote:
I'd like to ask if there is a recommended Code Management System for
OpenSolaris.
Solaris is shipped with "sccs" (/usr/ccs/bin/sccs), and inside Sun all Solaris
sources
are under SCCS. We use Sun's CodeManager (also known as TeamWare) as primary
Code Management System f
Yes, technical issues. What else should we be interested?
Having gone through most of the variants of Linux, it seems me that the
Fedora/RHEL combo is an excellent development model that can be followed by
OpenSolaris/Solaris. Discussions on the technical merits of
OpenSolaris/Solaris vis-a
I'd like to ask if there is a recommended Code Management System for
OpenSolaris.
Solaris is shipped with "sccs" (/usr/ccs/bin/sccs), and inside Sun all Solaris
sources
are under SCCS. We use Sun's CodeManager (also known as TeamWare) as primary
Code Management System for Solaris development, and
I have noticed that there are two kinds of companies in this regard.
1. Companies that analyze how cheaply they can procure the hardware and
software on which they run their IT infrastructure.
2. Companies that depend on having some relationship with a vendor who can both
provide support and s
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I am wondering if anyone would be interested in discussing Solaris_86
(10 and later) vis-a-vis Linux?
Do we have to? There are so many different email lists and/or newsgroups
that are already discussing that.
Unless we are talking e.g technical issu
I am wondering if anyone would be interested in discussing Solaris_86 (10 and
later) vis-a-vis Linux?
I have been using Red Hat Linux since 4.2 and am very pleased, as far as
desktops are concerned, with Fedora Core 4. However, because of several
critical issues (e.g., inability to include pro
>Does this mean that OpenSolaris will not be ble to deal with this
>ACPI implementation (or with this board)?
Unless you don't use ACPI enumeration or if you fix the AML.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>I'd like to lead a desktop community focused on JDS. There's absolutely
> >>no reason that others can't jump in with proposals to lead KDE, XFCE, or
> >>other variants - in fact, I'
>Jul 2 11:10:09 s11 genunix: [ID 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: The binding
>file entry "iprb 214" c
onflicts with a previous entry on line 201 of /etc/name_to_major
There's an issue here with corruption in the /etc/*_* files;
/etc/name_to_major has duplicate entries and these are also not
as th
Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Solaris 10 is not OpenSolaris (yet) and starting immediately with 2
> > different
> > desktops is a bit hard for the SchilliX maintainers.
>
> The SchilliX maintainers don't have to be part of every single
> OpenSolaris community or include all of
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to lead a desktop community focused on JDS. There's absolutely
no reason that others can't jump in with proposals to lead KDE, XFCE, or
other variants - in fact, I'd totally encourage anyone to do so!
I did see recently t
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stefan Teleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how about a KDE community as well ? :-)
lead-in: i am in the process of packaging and uploading KDE 3.4.1 for
Solaris 10, both of x86 and SPARC, at KDE. finally. :-) i will post
here when it's ready and sync'ed (very shortly).
Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Dana H. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have a look here:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/acpica/osl.c#570
What I'm contemplating is adding yet another acpi-user-options bit to
disable access control for those willing to experiment with i
"Dana H. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a look here:
>
> http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/acpica/osl.c#570
>
> What I'm contemplating is adding yet another acpi-user-options bit to
> disable access control for those willing to experiment with it.
So you think
Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Dana H. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 972481 kern.warning] WARNING: AcpiOsWritePort:
cf8 32 not permitted
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 815887 kern.notice] ACPI-0519: *** Error:
Jul 4 21:41:45 s11 acpica: [ID 441208 kern.notice]
> On my machine anyway, a single power button press
> induces shutdown.
>
> A triple press induces panic+crashdump.
That's only if you've installed the experimental acpidrv (part of frkit)
Dana
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-d
"Dana H. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > If I plug in a PS/2 mouse (even after the system is booted successfully)
> > the keyboard becomes non-functional until the system is rebooted.
>
> That's odd. I'll have to forward this to the keyboard/mouse team;
> it doesn
Stefan Teleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how about a KDE community as well ? :-)
>
> lead-in: i am in the process of packaging and uploading KDE 3.4.1 for
> Solaris 10, both of x86 and SPARC, at KDE. finally. :-) i will post
> here when it's ready and sync'ed (very shortly).
Solaris 10 is not
this helps my system a lot. no more hanging at 'rebooting...". And power off
works as alan described.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'd like to start the ball rolling in getting an OpenSolaris Desktop
> Community launched. Let's face it, there's an awful lot of FUD being
> spread around OpenSolaris not being ready for the desktop - it's time to
> prove them wrong ;)
>
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Jul 2 11:10:09 s11 genunix: [ID 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: The binding file entry
"iprb 214" conflicts with a previous entry on line 201 of /etc/name_to_major
Jul 2 11:10:09 s11 genunix: [ID 723599 kern.warning] WARNING: Driver alias
"pci8086,
It works now.
Thanks.
Victor
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(There are really only two AML interpreters and compilers:
the one found in Windows and the one from Intel (ACPICA) which
is used in Solaris, Linux and others.
Does Linux actually uses Intel's one or is that written from scratch? If
the question is
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, James Lick wrote:
Dragan Cvetkovic wrote:
dd: /dev/rdiskette: open: No such file or directory
So, as far as Solaris is concerned, there is no floppy drive at all. It has
worked fine before switching to new ACPI architecture.
I see you've already fixed your problem, but
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Victor Feng wrote:
The smpatch analyze, smpatch download worked last week. Today, they always give error message
"response code was 500", and the log message says "can not create cache
downloader".
There were some issues with the infrastructure that runs
updateserver.su
53 matches
Mail list logo
