Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-02 Thread Michel Catudal
Michael Schwingen a écrit : > Zach Welch wrote: > >> Sheesh. One religious war per week isn't enough? ;) We made it past >> the C vs C++ language war only to be caught up in whitespace wars? :) >> >> > Just my thought. We have had this discussions - what, half a year ago? > > I do not

Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-02 Thread Michael Schwingen
Zach Welch wrote: > Sheesh. One religious war per week isn't enough? ;) We made it past > the C vs C++ language war only to be caught up in whitespace wars? :) > Just my thought. We have had this discussions - what, half a year ago? I do not understand why such taste discussions have to pop u

Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-02 Thread Michael Schwingen
Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > It extremely hard to mis-interpret the width of a space, and my hard > disk, compiler, and eyes cannot tell the difference. > > What are you seeing when you look at tms_seq? Does it look nice and > organized neatly into columns? > The first block looks equally borked

Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-02 Thread Øyvind Harboe
What about those that do not care about whitespaces? I don't want to read a 100 page document, nor do I want to participate in any discussions Can we have a tool that automatically reformats and stores .c/.h code in some defined format in SVN using hooks? :-) Also, I've developed white space

Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-01 Thread Zach Welch
Dick, While I am responding to your initial post, I also use it as launchpad for sharing my broader position on the topic, so it's not all aimed at you. :) On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 08:02 -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > Are other folks having problems with tab expansion differences between > editors

Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-01 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
Magnus Lundin wrote: > Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > >> Laurent Gauch wrote: >> >> Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > / Are other folks having problems with tab expansion differences between > > > />/ editors? >>>

Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-01 Thread Magnus Lundin
Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > Laurent Gauch wrote: > >>> Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >>> >>> / Are other folks having problems with tab expansion differences between >>> />/ editors? >>> />/ >>> />/ I load jtag.c into two different editors and get two different

Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-01 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
Laurent Gauch wrote: >> Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >> >>> / Are other folks having problems with tab expansion differences between >>> >> />/ editors? >> />/ >> />/ I load jtag.c into two different editors and get two different results >> />/ when tab width is set to 4. >> />/ >> />/ Th

[Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-01 Thread Laurent Gauch
> > Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > >/ Are other folks having problems with tab expansion differences between > />/ editors? > />/ > />/ I load jtag.c into two different editors and get two different results > />/ when tab width is set to 4. > />/ > />/ This makes it difficult to view a table like tms

Re: [Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-01 Thread Gene Smith
Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > Are other folks having problems with tab expansion differences between > editors? > > I load jtag.c into two different editors and get two different results > when tab width is set to 4. > > This makes it difficult to view a table like tms_seq in the two > editors. Th

[Openocd-development] tab vs spaces

2009-05-01 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
Are other folks having problems with tab expansion differences between editors? I load jtag.c into two different editors and get two different results when tab width is set to 4. This makes it difficult to view a table like tms_seq in the two editors. The editors are well established, JEdit a