Hi all,
Last week, I had a conference call with Dan Ravicher, Legal Director of
the Software Freedom Law Center, and two of his colleagues. He helped
answer some questions that came up for me during the licensing debate.
Further, he has generously offered to take questions from the community
rega
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 23:30, Duane Ellis wrote:
> Zach Welch wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is the full list of GPL-compliant solutions for libftd2xx GPL
>> compliance, after further review, consideration, and enumeration:
>>
>> 1) Documentation: build it yourself!
>> 2) Build-Kit: automate the bu
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 01:17 -0700, Rob Barris wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2009, at 1:32 PM, openocd-development-requ...@lists.berlios.de
> wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>> 4) libftdi-ftd2xx: ABI compatible with libftdi, wraps ftd2xx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> How would ftd2xx be linked here? Via LoadLibrary (dlopen) and
On Jun 24, 2009, at 1:32 PM, openocd-development-requ...@lists.berlios.de
wrote:
>>>
>>> 4) libftdi-ftd2xx: ABI compatible with libftdi, wraps ftd2xx
>>
>>
>>
>> How would ftd2xx be linked here? Via LoadLibrary (dlopen) and
>> friends?
>> I'd volunteer to create such a solution.
>
> We build
Zach Welch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is the full list of GPL-compliant solutions for libftd2xx GPL
> compliance, after further review, consideration, and enumeration:
>
> 1) Documentation: build it yourself!
> 2) Build-Kit: automate the build on users' machines
> 3) XXX: to be revealed, if legal
>
Zach Welch wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 20:14 +0100, Ian Guffick wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the full list of GPL-compliant solutions for libftd2xx GPL
>>> compliance, after further review, consideration, and enumeration:
>>>
>>> 1) Documentation: build it yourself!
>>> 2) Build-Kit: automate the bui
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:26 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
>
> We can raise money to pay for the signing costs; presumably, they don't
> need to be signed during development testing.
>
My IT guys said that in Vista unsigned drivers can be loaded if you
enable a boot time option and it only lasts fo
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 20:14 +0100, Ian Guffick wrote:
>
> > Here is the full list of GPL-compliant solutions for libftd2xx GPL
> > compliance, after further review, consideration, and enumeration:
> >
> > 1) Documentation: build it yourself!
> > 2) Build-Kit: automate the build on users' machines
> Here is the full list of GPL-compliant solutions for libftd2xx GPL
> compliance, after further review, consideration, and enumeration:
>
> 1) Documentation: build it yourself!
> 2) Build-Kit: automate the build on users' machines
> 3) XXX: to be revealed, if legal
> 4) libftdi-ftd2xx: ABI comp
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 19:20 +0200, Dominic wrote:
> Hello Zach,
>
>
>
> thank you for this posting. I was just formulating a reply to some of
> your last emails, but it's probably better if what I had to say
> remains in the privacy of my harddrive.
Since you have said that, I am intensely curi
Hello Zach,
thank you for this posting. I was just formulating a reply to some of your
last emails, but it's probably better if what I had to say remains in the
privacy of my harddrive.
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 18:30:09 Zach Welch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is the full list of GPL-compliant sol
Hi all,
Here is the full list of GPL-compliant solutions for libftd2xx GPL
compliance, after further review, consideration, and enumeration:
1) Documentation: build it yourself!
2) Build-Kit: automate the build on users' machines
3) XXX: to be revealed, if legal
4) libftdi-ftd2xx: ABI compatible
12 matches
Mail list logo
