On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Aaron Carroll wrote:
> On 21 March 2011 23:45, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> Can anyone think of a good reason why we're
>> duplicating these source files at this point?
>
> These were duplicated because I didn't want to break anyone's A8 while
> getting A9 support up.
On 21 March 2011 23:45, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Can anyone think of a good reason why we're
> duplicating these source files at this point?
These were duplicated because I didn't want to break anyone's A8 while
getting A9 support up. I think most (all?) of the A9 changes should be
correct for A8
Can anyone think of a good reason why we're
duplicating these source files at this point?
I just got a Pandaboard today and ti_pandaboard.cfg is currently using
omap3530.cfg, which uses Cortex A8, even if the Pandaboard is a
Cortex A9.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your projec
