> This is a dumb question (because I could answer it by looking at the
> code for a little while), but can the polling mechanism be separated and
> moved into a JTAG sub-layer? It seems that this kind of coordination
> implies that some part of it should already be there.
The callback is just a g
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I was thinking that pathmove, irscan and drscan commands should
> fail or at least give a warning if they are invoked while background
> polling is running.
>
> But isn't that a "layering violation"?
>
> Should target tell jtag when it is doin
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 08:23 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I was thinking that pathmove, irscan and drscan commands should
> fail or at least give a warning if they are invoked while background
> polling is running.
Sounds reasonable.
> But isn't that a "layering violation"?
It looks like it, yes
I was thinking that pathmove, irscan and drscan commands should
fail or at least give a warning if they are invoked while background
polling is running.
But isn't that a "layering violation"?
Should target tell jtag when it is doing background polling or
should jtag check when target is doing pol
