M
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] gdb: mismatch gdb watchpoint enumeration
order
Hi Jerry,
could you test the patch to see if it solves your problems?
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale C
Hi Jerry,
could you test the patch to see if it solves your problems?
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
From 682beb8ca5506a8fdb3b89fc227942bdee51a6d1 Mon
Take #3. Fix some warnings.
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
From 682beb8ca5506a8fdb3b89fc227942bdee51a6d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=98
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:04 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 11 January 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> > Maybe if you passed wp_type not bp_type ... ?
>>
>> Thanks. Fixed. I meant well. :-)
>
> Looks right now. ;)
I'll await test results. I haven't tried it.
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll fre
On Monday 11 January 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> > Maybe if you passed wp_type not bp_type ... ?
>
> Thanks. Fixed. I meant well. :-)
Looks right now. ;)
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios
> If that enumeration is defined by GDB protocol, it should not be placed
> in target.h - doing so is a layering violation which leads to errors
> just like this one.
It isn't. What happens in gdb_server.c is that there is a switch
statement to convert from GDB enum to OpenOCD enum. This is
a clea
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:27 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 11 January 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> How's this patch?
>
> Maybe if you passed wp_type not bp_type ... ?
Thanks. Fixed. I meant well. :-)
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http:/
Jerry Ling wrote:
> There is a bug when using gdb to set read/write watchpoint.
> OOCD will actually set a "write" watchpoint if you set "read" watchpoint
> through gdb, and vis versa.
>
> Since...
> [target/breakpoints.h]
> enum watchpoint_rw
> {
> WPT_READ = 0, WPT_WRITE = 1, WPT_ACCESS = 2
On Monday 11 January 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> How's this patch?
Maybe if you passed wp_type not bp_type ... ?
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Sunday 10 January 2010, Jerry Ling wrote:
> ... watchpoint_add(target, address, size, type-2, 0, 0xu) ...
Yeah, why isn't it passing "wp_type", which was already set
up with the right enum value? It does the right thing for
setting breakpoints, just a couple lines before. Sigh.
Doin
How's this patch?
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
From ac931e8a3bd7fa6bb4434d0cb58a0a55d2fd3507 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=98yvind=20
Hi,
There is a bug when using gdb to set read/write watchpoint.
OOCD will actually set a "write" watchpoint if you set "read" watchpoint
through gdb, and vis versa.
Since...
[target/breakpoints.h]
enum watchpoint_rw
{
WPT_READ = 0, WPT_WRITE = 1, WPT_ACCESS = 2
};
But...
[server/gdb_server.
12 matches
Mail list logo
