Re: [Openocd-development] first ftd2xx fix: documentation!

2009-06-25 Thread Freddie Chopin
Gene Smith pisze: > Maybe I'm missing the point but you can also build openocd with cygwin > using the gcc flag -mno-cygwin. You do need a finite number of cygwin > packages such as gcc, make etc beyond the default install. So more or less the same as with msys [; > The howto on this is on Spar

Re: [Openocd-development] first ftd2xx fix: documentation!

2009-06-25 Thread Gene Smith
Freddie Chopin wrote: > Main problem with build environment for Windows is that MinGW itself is > just a compiler, and MSYS is just a shell. You need like a dozen of > different addons for MSYS, and you need to compile them and install > them. It's not common knowledge for Windows user what is t

Re: [Openocd-development] first ftd2xx fix: documentation!

2009-06-25 Thread Pavel Chromy
Hello Zach and the list, Zach Welch napsal(a): > It remains somewhat unclear to me exactly how badly distributors need to > see a solution today, when users (who are all developers, right?) should > be able to compile the code themselves and use the FTD2XX driver. I would like draw attention to

Re: [Openocd-development] first ftd2xx fix: documentation!

2009-06-24 Thread Freddie Chopin
Main problem with build environment for Windows is that MinGW itself is just a compiler, and MSYS is just a shell. You need like a dozen of different addons for MSYS, and you need to compile them and install them. It's not common knowledge for Windows user what is the system directory on linux.

[Openocd-development] first ftd2xx fix: documentation!

2009-06-24 Thread Zach Welch
Hello, It remains somewhat unclear to me exactly how badly distributors need to see a solution today, when users (who are all developers, right?) should be able to compile the code themselves and use the FTD2XX driver. If Windows is the blocker, the first question that should be answered is: ho