On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:45 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 07 June 2009, David Brownell wrote:
>> > How about retiring the "endstate" command?
>>
>> No current in-tree users, FWIW.
>
> ... except beagleboard init, sorry.
Does that usage happen to be broken anyway?
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embed
On Sunday 07 June 2009, David Brownell wrote:
> > How about retiring the "endstate" command?
>
> No current in-tree users, FWIW.
... except beagleboard init, sorry.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists
On Sunday 07 June 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> How about retiring the "endstate" command?
No current in-tree users, FWIW. Make sure you remove
the openocd.texi references to it too ... might want
to first merge the openocd.texi "user's guide tweaks"
patch I sent last week, so you don't break its
How about retiring the "endstate" command?
This command can't work unless polling is turned off
as the global endstate gets overwritten by the
background polling.
If other commands such as "drscan" does not have a clearly
defined default end-state then the endstate of such commands
is effectively
