On Monday 28 December 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I'm not quite up to speed on the SWD stuff yet, but I want
> to follow this closely enough that I can implement hardware
> acceleration of the SWD protocol on the ZY1000(an embedded
> OpenOCD host).
My l33t mind-reading powers have improved. I kn
I'm not quite up to speed on the SWD stuff yet, but I want
to follow this closely enough that I can implement hardware
acceleration of the SWD protocol on the ZY1000(an embedded
OpenOCD host).
What embedded hosts offers is very low processing power(on par
with an arm7/9 or so), but also very low l
On Saturday 14 November 2009, Andrew Rogers wrote:
> SWD is not finished yet, a long way to go. Adding the actual hardware
> drivers is a almost the last thing on my list. I want to get the
> framework in place first.
I don't entirely agree about "almost the last thing", since that
can make increm
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 08:22 +, Andrew Rogers wrote:
> SWD is not finished yet, a long way to go. Adding the actual hardware
> drivers is a almost the last thing on my list. I want to get the
> framework in place first.
>
> What I have done is to get a SWD interface listed when you use 'openocd
SWD is not finished yet, a long way to go. Adding the actual hardware
drivers is a almost the last thing on my list. I want to get the
framework in place first.
What I have done is to get a SWD interface listed when you use 'openocd
-c interface_list'. There's a new struct (interface_base_t) added