Re: [Openocd-development] SIGSEGV on svn:1198

2008-12-02 Thread Kees Jongenburger
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Rick Altherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What config file are you using when this happens? What host OS/architecture > are you using? amd64 with the given configuration greetings btw performing 7 times irscan 0 7 drscan 0 8 0X89 also makes it go BOOM > > Rick

Re: [Openocd-development] SIGSEGV on svn:1198

2008-12-01 Thread Rick Altherr
What config file are you using when this happens? What host OS/ architecture are you using? Rick On Dec 1, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Kees Jongenburger wrote: Hi I am trying the run a drscan 0 32 0xa3002048 and I am getting a SIGSEGV. Just posting here so you know :p Program received signal SIGS

Re: [Openocd-development] SIGSEGV on svn:1198

2008-12-01 Thread Rick Altherr
I haven't attempted to reproduce but I thought I would mention a few things for those investigating. buf_set_buf() died because the passed in src was bogus. That means the arg was wrong when buf_set_buf() was invoked by jtag_build_buffer() at jtag.c:1228. Rick On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:14 PM

Re: [Openocd-development] SIGSEGV on svn:1198

2008-12-01 Thread Duane Ellis
Kees Jongenburger wrote: > Hi > > I am trying the run a drscan 0 32 0xa3002048 and I am getting a > SIGSEGV. Just posting here so you know :p > I don't see anything obvious :-( FYI -you should be able to specify "drscan TAPNAME 32 0xa3002048" instead of the hard coded 0 above. That was the i

[Openocd-development] SIGSEGV on svn:1198

2008-12-01 Thread Kees Jongenburger
Hi I am trying the run a drscan 0 32 0xa3002048 and I am getting a SIGSEGV. Just posting here so you know :p Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7f47fee1b6e0 (LWP 13122)] 0x0044dd1f in buf_set_buf (src=0xff00ff , src_start=0, dst=0x70cfb0 "