Am 06/10/2011 07:00 PM, schrieb Pete Batard:
> It is. Heck, I only have to quote you on being "confident that a
> release before 2011 (was) achievable", or Segher dismissing people
> like myself or Xiaofan as "naysayer" when we shared our pessimistic
> outlook about that statement, to make you real
On 2011.06.10 16:12, Peter Stuge wrote:
Pete Batard wrote:
Peter's involvement as a maintainer has mostly been limited to
rebuilding his personal (i.e. non official) git branch every 3
months or so.
If this is really how things look that is bad.
It is. Heck, I only have to quote you on being
Pete Batard wrote:
> Peter's involvement as a maintainer has mostly been limited to
> rebuilding his personal (i.e. non official) git branch every 3
> months or so.
If this is really how things look that is bad.
I like to rebase my libusb repo, which makes it difficult to see if
the last change w
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> But he doesn't have the time for that. He also puts
>> too much emphasis on things like git/trac which are important but
>> should not trumpet the proper going of a project.
>
> The OpenOCD project needs someone like him to set the bar
> for
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Xiao, with your involvement to both projects, I long thought you are
> already a maintainer/developer! Why not yet? :-)
Take note I am not a programmer and I do not do coding...
I am an admin in the libusb-win32 project but my role there is
m
> But he doesn't have the time for that. He also puts
> too much emphasis on things like git/trac which are important but
> should not trumpet the proper going of a project.
The OpenOCD project needs someone like him to set the bar
for higher patch quality. This improves quality of OpenOCD and
red
Xiao, with your involvement to both projects, I long thought you are
already a maintainer/developer! Why not yet? :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Peter won't be alone on this project. He will be one of the maintainers,
> perhaps that will work better for everybody?
>
I agree with this one. I think OpenOCD is better in this aspect
since there are more maintainers. So there is nothing l
On 2011.06.10 14:03, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Peter won't be alone on this project. He will be one of the maintainers,
perhaps that will work better for everybody?
If I may (and then I'll shut up as, unless Peter has anything to say, I
think I've taken enough of your time here), I don't foresee Op
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2011.06.10 13:24, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, Peter has certainly refused to step down, despite everybody else on
>>> the list pretty much voicing their support to the idea that this is the
>>> right thing for him to do, if he doesn't
On 2011.06.10 13:24, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Well, Peter has certainly refused to step down, despite everybody else on
the list pretty much voicing their support to the idea that this is the
right thing for him to do, if he doesn't have the time/doesn't want to be
involved.
Ah. This is the tricky
> Well, Peter has certainly refused to step down, despite everybody else on
> the list pretty much voicing their support to the idea that this is the
> right thing for him to do, if he doesn't have the time/doesn't want to be
> involved.
Ah. This is the tricky bit. Has someone *qualified* offered
Hi Øyvind. I very much appreciate the constructive advice for help.
On 2011.06.10 12:21, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Seems like a good opportunity for someone in the community to
step up to the plate and take over the project if they want to.
Well, the only problem we have here is that Daniel Drake,
Seems like a good opportunity for someone in the community to
step up to the plate and take over the project if they want to.
Has someone obviously qualified stepped up and offered to help on
libusb as a maintainer? Has Peter refused such an offer?
Has someone qualified stepped up and offered to
On 2011.06.10 07:10, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
The community is very fortunate that he is *able*
Wow, that is great to know.
Peter will be able to understand what I mean...
Yes.
I'm happy for Peter here, and while I apologize for the intrusion as
well as the opinion I am about to provide on matt
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Øyvind Harboe
> wrote:
>> I'm very pleased to announce Peter Stuge as an OpenOCD maintainer.
Congrats,
nice news for the community.
Good luck Peter.
BR,
Drasko
_
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I'm very pleased to announce Peter Stuge as an OpenOCD maintainer.
Glad to hear that
> The community is very fortunate that he is *able*
Wow, that is great to know.
Peter will be able to understand what I mean...
> and willing
That is f
I'm very pleased to announce Peter Stuge as an OpenOCD maintainer.
The community is very fortunate that he is able and willing to
donate a little bit of time in commenting and committing
some of the patches.
His work so far, both in terms of actual code and patches and
contributions in mentoring
18 matches
Mail list logo
