On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Zach Welch wrote:
> Precisely. Packagers and distributors should _never_ maintain
> out-of-tree patches, unless the upstream tree has rejected them.
> To do otherwise is forked.
I see, I had to modify one thing in 0.1.0 - patch openocd.c to remove
conditional incl
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:57 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009, CeDeROM wrote:
> > > Got patches for us? :)
> >
> > Do You mean patches for the other cables or to build the package?
> > If You want to build the program, update the port tree with portsnap and
> > type:
>
> I
On Wednesday 03 June 2009, CeDeROM wrote:
> > Got patches for us? :)
>
> Do You mean patches for the other cables or to build the package?
> If You want to build the program, update the port tree with portsnap and type:
I suspect he meant patches against the current OpenOCD tree to
make sure your
Hello Zach!
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Zach Welch wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:22 +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
>> Hello world!
>>
>> OpenOCD 0.1.0 is now available on FreeBSD platform :-)
>> Not all cables are available though - most of USB dongles work, these
>> that required sys/io.h and mic
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:22 +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello world!
>
> OpenOCD 0.1.0 is now available on FreeBSD platform :-)
> Not all cables are available though - most of USB dongles work, these
> that required sys/io.h and microhttpd does not work.
> If someone needs these cables and want them a
Hello world!
OpenOCD 0.1.0 is now available on FreeBSD platform :-)
Not all cables are available though - most of USB dongles work, these
that required sys/io.h and microhttpd does not work.
If someone needs these cables and want them added, please send me
patches and I will update
http://www.fre
