Ouch it's actually target_write_buffer() that breaks these rules
target_write_buffer() aligns only the target address and does not
consider the host address...
As the jtag_add_xxscan() API is byte based, then we manage to
escape problems, but post 0.4 I think target_write_buffer() should
On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> The prototype below is problematic I would like to have
> seen buffer defined as "const void *" and added the requirement
> that "buffer" should be aligned to match "size"
>
> int target_write_memory(struct target *target,
>
The prototype below is problematic I would like to have
seen buffer defined as "const void *" and added the requirement
that "buffer" should be aligned to match "size"
int target_write_memory(struct target *target,
uint32_t address, uint32_t size, uint32_t count, uint8_t
*
