> If those threats were not serious, then I'll post a version linked to
> ftd2xx too - it's still better on Windows, and I don't think this is
> going to change any time soon.
IANAL, but stating your intentions publicly to violate the GPL license
does not improve your standing in any way...
The c
On 2010-02-14 20:49, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Please post the information you have to:
This way they would know who ratted them out, wouldn't they? (;
4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.d
On 2010-02-14 18:28, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> ... the third is ancient (r200-something) ...
Sorry - multiply that by 7.5 (r1500-something). There are other versions
in the same place too.
4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@l
Hi [;
You do remember the ftd2xx case? I clearly remember some of OpenOCD
leaders stating that any violation of GPL (distributing OpenOCD linked
to ftd2xx) will be legally fought, courts and various organizations
would be informed, etc.. Yet today I've found a fourth case of violating
this "ru
