Re: [Openocd-development] C vs. C99 vs. C++

2009-05-01 Thread Zach Welch
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 01:42 -0700, Zach Welch wrote: > You beat me to posting a summary thread. > > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:17 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > We don't have a way to measure consensus but I belive the current > > consensus can be summarized as: > > > > - OpenOCD stays C for now.

Re: [Openocd-development] C vs. C99 vs. C++

2009-05-01 Thread Zach Welch
You beat me to posting a summary thread. On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:17 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > We don't have a way to measure consensus but I belive the current > consensus can be summarized as: > > - OpenOCD stays C for now. There has to be a good plan and > major upside to budge the status