Jon Povey wrote:
> Andrew Leech wrote:
> > For what its worth I just reprogrammed my actel FPGA just fine with
> > your svf_implement_sleep_for_RUNTEST_min_time patch compiled in, so
> > you've got no complaints from me.
>
> Belated thanks.
>
> Does that qualify as a Tested-by:, an Acked-by:, or
Andrew Leech wrote:
> For what its worth I just reprogrammed my actel FPGA just fine with
> your svf_implement_sleep_for_RUNTEST_min_time patch compiled in, so
> you've got no complaints from me.
Belated thanks.
Does that qualify as a Tested-by:, an Acked-by:, or just a slight nod
of the head? :)
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Andrew Leech wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
>> Andrew Leech wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2011, at 3:12 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
>>
Ping.
>>>
>>> I never delved much into the actual SVF commands, so can't
>>> comment on the basic logic of it, ho
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
> Andrew Leech wrote:
>> On 06/01/2011, at 3:12 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
>
>>> Ping.
>>
>> I never delved much into the actual SVF commands, so can't
>> comment on the basic logic of it, however if the new
>> functionality is correct the old stuff bloc
Andrew Leech wrote:
> On 06/01/2011, at 3:12 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
>> Ping.
>
> I never delved much into the actual SVF commands, so can't
> comment on the basic logic of it, however if the new
> functionality is correct the old stuff blocked out by #if 1/0
> should be removed before committing ups
On 06/01/2011, at 3:12 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
> Jon Povey wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Povey
>>
>> min_time was effectively ignored, I needed it to program a
>> Lattice MachXO
>> which uses a RUNTEST to wait for an erase operation, amongst
>> other things.
>>
>> With this patch pauses happen and
Jon Povey wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jon Povey
>
> min_time was effectively ignored, I needed it to program a
> Lattice MachXO
> which uses a RUNTEST to wait for an erase operation, amongst
> other things.
>
> With this patch pauses happen and I can program the device with an SVF
> generated in LSC i
Signed-off-by: Jon Povey
min_time was effectively ignored, I needed it to program a Lattice MachXO
which uses a RUNTEST to wait for an erase operation, amongst other things.
With this patch pauses happen and I can program the device with an SVF
generated in LSC ispVM (with "Rev D Standard" check
