On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 23:31 +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> Zach,
>
> > > This breaks my build on cygwin, native win32 and ubuntu (intrepid).
> > > I will try and find some time later this week to look into.
> >
> > I will look at Ubuntu shortly and potentially post a patch,
> > but I can also ta
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 22:48 +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote:
[snip]
> This breaks my build on cygwin, native win32 and ubuntu (intrepid).
> I will try and find some time later this week to look into.
I will look at Ubuntu shortly and potentially post a patch, but I can
also take a stab at cygwin if yo
>
> Committed.
>
> Note that treating warnings as errors may well have to stay
> non-default. Be prepared for a bit of flak...
>
> Since you're willing to address issues that are brought up
> here, I'm applying the patch to see if we can navigate some
> dire straits w/a few patches and then b
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 23:06 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Committed.
>
> Note that treating warnings as errors may well have to stay
> non-default. Be prepared for a bit of flak...
Did you mean "on as default"? I hope that to be the case, as I think
most developers do not report warnings - only
Committed.
Note that treating warnings as errors may well have to stay
non-default. Be prepared for a bit of flak...
Since you're willing to address issues that are brought up here, I'm
applying the patch to see if we can navigate some dire straits
w/a few patches and then be out into more open w
Hi all,
I have attached a patch that allows the OpenOCD project to use the
-Wextra and -Werror flags, providing new configuration options to
disable them (--disable-wextra and --disable-werror, respectively).
In the process, I updated the help text of the gccwarnings option to
better reflect th
