On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Øyvind Harboe
> wrote:
>> We never will merge 0.5.0 release branch into the master branch, ideally
>> it would receive zero, but realistically might receive a few commits.
>> Possibly reverting commits in mas
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> We never will merge 0.5.0 release branch into the master branch, ideally
> it would receive zero, but realistically might receive a few commits.
> Possibly reverting commits in master branch?
Yeah now I know how things work. Just wanted to f
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe
> wrote:
>> I'll update master branch.
>>
>> The way git works we don't cut development branches, we just
>> keep working on master branch.
>>
>> We may cut a 0.5 branch from some previous time i
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I'll update master branch.
>
> The way git works we don't cut development branches, we just
> keep working on master branch.
>
> We may cut a 0.5 branch from some previous time in master
> history later on.
Ah, there is 0.4.0 so anyone can s
Merged.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Hey Oyvind! Thank you for support in this matter! Just please add
> those patches to new branch v0.5 as they bring general code
> reorganization and are not part of 0.4.x :-)
I'll update master branch.
The way git works we don't cut developme
Hey Oyvind! Thank you for support in this matter! Just please add
those patches to new branch v0.5 as they bring general code
reorganization and are not part of 0.4.x :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing l
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in|1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 ++
src/jtag/Makefile.am|2 --
src/jtag/adapter.c
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in|1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 ++
src/jtag/Makefile.am|2 --
src/jtag/adapter.c
Øyvind,
could you please remake the patch adding the flags "-M -C" to git
format-patch and post it again?
These flags will detect the file move/rename and highlight just the
modifications.
Patch review would be much easier.
Thank you
Antonio
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in |1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 +
src/jtag/Makefile.am |2 -
src/jtag/adapter.c|2 +-
src/jtag/core.c
Just to clarify: this patch does nothing, it just moves files around.
It makes subsequent swd patches less noisy.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cor
12 matches
Mail list logo
