On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Charles Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Øyvind Harboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Charles Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Following patch added some incremental debugging for a devices t
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Øyvind Harboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Charles Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Following patch added some incremental debugging for a devices that are
>> broken - ie print the number of the device in bypass that is having i
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Charles Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following patch added some incremental debugging for a devices that are
> broken - ie print the number of the device in bypass that is having issues
>
> Mainly patches the drscan back to the handle_drscan because of the f
Following patch added some incremental debugging for a devices that are
broken - ie print the number of the device in bypass that is having issues
Mainly patches the drscan back to the handle_drscan because of the following
patch that makes the underlying commands not really need to be tcl aware