> What exactly is checked by jenkins currently? I suggest at least one
> build with the default "./configure" (no options) and one with as many
> "./configure" options enabled as is possible on the build host.
It's very early days still and we're still sorting out problems.
We have ambitions to d
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:32:42PM +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> - Jenkins will build and check your patch for warnings. If you generate
> warnings in some of the configurations that Jenkins checks for, you will
> get an email w/info about that. No other humans will waste time on your
> patch befor
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:18:18 +0200
Peter Stuge wrote:
> You need an OpenID from somewhere (let me know if you want one from me)
> You need to register on a web page and pick a username
> You need to set an HTTP password or upload a public SSH key
>
> The above takes not two minutes.
If you have
Actually, in some ways nothing has changed when we switched to Gerrit.
Before Gerrit, OpenOCD maintainers had stopped lifting patches into git and
now we don't lift them into Gerrit. Same thing, except with Gerrit contributors
(or anyone) have the option of lifting patches into Gerrit themselves.
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> If you want to spend the time taking other people's patches and
> pushing them to Gerrit so they don't have to, go right ahead.
Obviously not if I am not in a hurry to take the time to setup for
gerrit even for myself.
Don't think the sarcasm was helpful there.
> We're sta
openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de wrote:
> Jon Povey wrote:
>> this additional barrier to contributing does put me and others off
>> contributing in future.
>
> Using Git is also a barrier for some, perhaps even for many. Gerrit
> is new, so sure there will be resistance. Maybe sometime
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> Some graphing I've been thinking about:
>>
>> - plot a number that shows the redundancy in maintainers. I.e. are we
>> relying on a single maintainer or are there multiple maintainers
>
> I've so far taken infinitely man
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Some graphing I've been thinking about:
>
> - plot a number that shows the redundancy in maintainers. I.e. are we
> relying on a single maintainer or are there multiple maintainers
I've so far taken infinitely many more commits from Gerrit into
openocd.git than before. Much
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> I'm thinking a bit about how I can draw up some graphs on this...
>
> Graphing number of commits is easy, but graphing the review is
> difficult.
Before we got Gerrit going I decided that I could no longer spend time
su
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I'm thinking a bit about how I can draw up some graphs on this...
Graphing number of commits is easy, but graphing the review is
difficult.
//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https:/
If you want to spend the time taking other people's patches and
pushing them to Gerrit so they don't have to, go right ahead.
You do not have to be an OpenOCD maintainer to do this, anyone
can push anyones patches to Gerrit for review.
I don't expect you to step up to take such a role, nor do I e
Jon Povey wrote:
> this additional barrier to contributing does put me and others off
> contributing in future.
Using Git is also a barrier for some, perhaps even for many. Gerrit
is new, so sure there will be resistance. Maybe sometime it will be
just as common as Git itself.
I think the learnin
openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de wrote:
> If you don't have time to work on OpenOCD, then I don't have any
> problems with that. The world is full of smart people who could have,
> but don't have time to, contribute to OpenOCD.
[...]
> If this means that we loose those contributors who
Freddie Chopin wrote:
>> Please read HACKING and post to Gerrit.
I second this.
> Sorry, I don't have time to do so because:
Sorry, noone has time to deal with your patch.
> 1. The patch is trivial
It might seem so, but actually it's not. It has multiple logical
changes combined in a single
If you don't have time to work on OpenOCD, then I don't have any
problems with that. The world is full of smart people who could have,
but don't have time to, contribute to OpenOCD.
If you do want to spend some time on OpenOCD, then I urge you to
have a look at what Gerrit+Jenkins does for the com
On 2011-10-19 19:50, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Please read HACKING and post to Gerrit.
Sorry, I don't have time to do so because:
1. The patch is trivial
2. I use git in Linux hosted in VitualBox, where emailing patches kinda
does not work
3. My knowledge of Linux and Git is minimal
So basically
Please read HACKING and post to Gerrit.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
http://www.zylin.com/
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.ber
Nothing to comment here - pretty straightforward.
4\/3!!
From 39cb927737d653db8610fce8001aa98e8b256451 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Freddie Chopin
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:55:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Unused variables
Fix a few errors with set and unused variables detected by GCC 4.7.0
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
