David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
As a side note this issue will also apply to armv5 cores with the bkpt
instruction.
>>> Curious ... there's already some logic to skip breakpoints
>>> there, you're saying it doesn't handle this case right?
>>>
>
On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> >> As a side note this issue will also apply to armv5 cores with the bkpt
> >> instruction.
> >
> > Curious ... there's already some logic to skip breakpoints
> > there, you're saying it doesn't handle this case right?
> >
>
> yes openocd wi
David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
>> David Brownell wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
Only software breakpoints known to openod are handled.
So this handles the sp
[ Re semihosting on Cortex-M3/ARMv7-M ]
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> > Hmm, my notion there was to make armv7m use the same "struct arm"
> > as other ARM cores, and try to share more core infrastructure.
> > It shouldn't be *quite* so different as it is now.
> >
>
> I have
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> >> Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
> >> Only software breakpoints known to openod are handled.
> >> So this handles the special case of a user adde
David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 18 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
This is a bugfix for RAM-based code, yes?
flash or ram, most semi hosting code would be in flas
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > On Monday 18 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> >> Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
> >
> > This is a bugfix for RAM-based code, yes?
>
> flash or ram, most semi hosting code would be in flash ho
David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
>> Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
>> Only software breakpoints known to openod are handled.
>> So this handles the special case of a user added bkpt, eg. semi-hosting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Spencer Olive
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
> Only software breakpoints known to openod are handled.
> So this handles the special case of a user added bkpt, eg. semi-hosting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver
OK by me, but I'd change
Hi,
Updated patch, now correct handles step.
Cheers
Spen
>From 669c0944a09bf40bcd606964e1dee967ab594b0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Spencer Oliver
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:44:03 +
Subject: [PATCH] ARMV7M: handle bkpt instruction on resume/step
Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on r
David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 18 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
>> Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
>
> This is a bugfix for RAM-based code, yes?
>
>
flash or ram, most semi hosting code would be in flash however.
I am updating the arm semihosting to support armv7m
On Monday 18 January 2010, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
This is a bugfix for RAM-based code, yes?
> +int armv7m_check_bkpt_inst(struct target *target)
This name leaves a lot to be desired. How about
using "maybe_skip" instead of "check"?
And th
Skip over a bkpt instruction if found on resume/step.
Only software breakpoints known to openod are handled.
So this handles the special case of a user added bkpt, eg. semi-hosting.
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver
---
src/target/armv7m.c| 31 +++
src/target/armv
13 matches
Mail list logo
