On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 23:08 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> > I just saw you did re-post... but you only waited 4 hours. That is not
> > enough time. You need to wait 12-24 hours, preferably 24.
>
> 24h it is until 0.2 is out then.
Let me try t
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> I just saw you did re-post... but you only waited 4 hours. That is not
> enough time. You need to wait 12-24 hours, preferably 24.
24h it is until 0.2 is out then.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://ww
I just saw you did re-post... but you only waited 4 hours. That is not
enough time. You need to wait 12-24 hours, preferably 24.
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:50 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
> You need to re-post patches when they change substantially. You added
> new code that was not in the original
You need to re-post patches when they change substantially. You added
new code that was not in the original patch.
It still has whitespace problems.
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 20:29 +0200, ohar...@mail.berlios.de wrote:
> Author: oharboe
> Date: 2009-07-08 20:29:03 +0200 (Wed, 08 Jul 2009)
> New R
