Re: [Openocd-development] Problem with OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc1 and STM32 verify_image

2011-07-22 Thread Freddie Chopin
On 2011-07-22 17:30, Andreas Fritiofson wrote: According to objdump, the completely different hex file is located in RAM: Oops (; Indeed it is - I forgot that it's from a project I recently experimented on... Sorry for the mess (; So - I cannot confirm the issue, it works for me with 0.4.0 -

Re: [Openocd-development] Problem with OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc1 and STM32 verify_image

2011-07-22 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote: > On 2011-07-21 23:02, Andreas Fritiofson wrote: > >> However I can't explain Freddie's reproduced failures. Maybe post the >> hex files (matching, slightly different and very different) and I can >> see if I can take a closer look at it? >> >

Re: [Openocd-development] Problem with OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc1 and STM32 verify_image

2011-07-21 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Magnus S. wrote: > Freddie Chopin writes: > > > > > I can partially confirm... > > > > Tested with 0.5.0-rc1 > > > > Comparing with "right image" works fine: > > > > > > Comparing with "almost right image" (compilation date inside has > > changed) works fine too

Re: [Openocd-development] Problem with OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc1 and STM32 verify_image

2011-07-21 Thread Magnus S .
Freddie Chopin writes: > > I can partially confirm... > > Tested with 0.5.0-rc1 > > Comparing with "right image" works fine: > > > Comparing with "almost right image" (compilation date inside has > changed) works fine too: > > > However... when checking against something completely wrong (

Re: [Openocd-development] Problem with OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc1 and STM32 verify_image

2011-07-21 Thread Freddie Chopin
I can partially confirm... Tested with 0.5.0-rc1 Comparing with "right image" works fine: verify_image c://stm32_blink_led.bin 0x800 verified 29888 bytes in 0.468750s (62.267 KiB/s) verify_image c://stm32_blink_led.bin verified 29888 bytes in 0.484375s (60.258 KiB/s) verify_image c://s