replacing the instruction at the
memory address with something to break when run, then why do we need to do this
for all the cores, isn't once enough?
James
---
This email message is for the sole use of the int
Hi,
I pulled out trunk 2604 and applied 4 patches. On my system, OpenOCD works the
way Dirk email has described.
Best regards,
James
--- On Sun, 8/23/09, Dirk Behme wrote:
> From: Dirk Behme
> Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD + beagle
> To: "David Brownell
Hi,
I have tried to follow the information on the following page to run OpenOCD
with Beagleboard & Flyswatter board using Ubuntu 9.04 and got some errors.
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-July/009314.html
The log message was
===
nd a terminal ;-)
Cheers,
James.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 09:11 +0800, SimonQian wrote:
> With some tweaks to OpenOCD, gdb in the latest Codesourcery G++ can
> work.
> For configuring Eclipse, you can also see
> http://developers.stf12.net./eclipse-demo.
This link yields a "Server Not Found Er
looked harder earlier. It was only when you asked for both binaries
that I saw the problem...
Compiled with -O0, I see from ls -l;
-rwxr-xr-x 1 james james 85440 2009-02-09 07:48 ct_in.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 james james 221506 2009-02-09 07:48 ct_in.elf
But compiled with -Os, I see...
-rwxr-xr-x 1 james j
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:48 -0800, Rick Altherr wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:00 PM, James wrote:
>
> >
> >> flash write_bank 0 ./obj/ct_in.bin 0
> > BUG: keep_alive() was not invoked in the 1000ms timelimit. GDB alive
> > packet not sent! (1079)
> > ti
nocd bug, or have I done/not done something in openocd?
Cheers,
James.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
