On Friday 23 October 2009 08:56:04 Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> > What's wrong with just keeping a buglist in a text file
> > and whittling it down? Other than the fact that nobody
> > seems to be whittling our current one down much.
>
> I'm just doing a poll to see what direction the community
> wants
On Friday 04 September 2009 21:39:08 Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> > Shouldn't it do that when TRST is released instead of when
> > it's asserted?
>
> Fixed in take #2.
>
> Testing anyone?
Yes, can you tell me how the expected result looks like? Debugging the
bootloader should just continue to work?
ho
On Friday 28 August 2009 19:28:50 Magnus Lundin wrote:
> The usual way for OpenOCD targets to check if a PROCESSOR_HALTED flag
> has been set is not to do it in the halt command but rather in the poll
> command.
> This in general improves performance when using long roundtrip
> interfaces like USB
On Thursday 27 August 2009 16:43:34 Dirk Behme wrote:
> Holger Freyther wrote:
> > Okay, turns out that I'm not able to omap3_dbginit scan once the linux
> > kernel is running and when linux is starts the "poll" will start to fail.
> > Does this sound familiar?
On Thursday 27 August 2009 07:04:22 Dirk Behme wrote:
> Holger Freyther wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work
> > on the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code,
> > it should make
On Thursday 27 August 2009 07:04:22 you wrote:
> Holger Freyther wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work
> > on the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code,
> > it should make it
Hey,
today Matt Hsu and me sat together to look into why OpenOCD does not work on
the beagle board. We have found and fixed some issues with the code, it should
make it more robust and we have fixed the root cause for us.
cortex_a8_dap_read_coreregister_u32 only returned 0x0 for the registers,
On Monday 20 April 2009 09:55:14 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wasn't able to apply this patch cleanly.
>
> Could you submit a patch against SVN?
maybe this works better
Index: src/target/arm7_9_common.c
===
--- src/target/arm7_9_common
e to differentiate them?
From 1e803ba440136a3b0277fe70f6f1cd3a5c1ff6a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Holger Freyther
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:45:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Currently a arm7_9_set_breakpoint after a arm7_9_unset_breakpoint is not possible
Unset breakpoint sets breakpoint->
