Thanks for your suggestions.
I'll work in that direction.
On 11 October 2011 07:47, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>>> I'm thinking a little about how to best get your work into OpenOCD.
>>>
>>>
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > how about using patchwoek simply as done for the kernel ML?
> >
> > One significant benefit of Gerrit is that it integrates really
> > well with git. Gerrit takes input from git, and output from
> > Gerrit goes to git.
..
> I prefer to manage git by my
On 19:31 Wed 12 Oct , Peter Stuge wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > how about using patchwoek simply as done for the kernel ML?
>
> One significant benefit of Gerrit is that it integrates really well
> with git. Gerrit takes input from git, and output from Gerrit goes to
> g
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> how about using patchwoek simply as done for the kernel ML?
One significant benefit of Gerrit is that it integrates really well
with git. Gerrit takes input from git, and output from Gerrit goes to
git. This helps everyone who is working with the code.
Pa
Hi,
how about using patchwoek simply as done for the kernel ML?
Best Regards,
J.
On 13:40 Tue 11 Oct , Spencer Oliver wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
> A Gerrit server has been setup at the following url:
> http://openocd.zylin.com/
>
> To keep loa
Jason wrote:
> Is there any intent to integrate gerrit back into the ML?
Sending email is easy. Receiving and parsing email is not as easy.
Thus anything actually worth calling integration takes a fair bit of
work.
> See [1] for an existing gripe.
I'm the Peter refered to there. I also like to
Spencer Oliver has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: docs: update project url's
..
docs: update project url's
Change-Id: I54fc3aff722ed25143aad85e58d19b72fcecbba0
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver
---
M NEWT
