On 20/04/2011 14.35, Michel JAOUEN wrote:
Hello,
I have a panda board. So I can do the test.
In file, omap4430.cfg , only one cortex_a8 is defined.
What is the dbg_base of the second one?
Best regards
Hi Michel,
if you check omap4430.cfg you can find the following info:
# APB DBGBASE reads
Hello,
I have a panda board. So I can do the test.
In file, omap4430.cfg , only one cortex_a8 is defined.
What is the dbg_base of the second one?
Best regards
-Original Message-
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On B
On 20/04/2011 9.39, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Looks a good patch to me. Bringing SMP support on OpenOCD is very good!
Unfortunately at the moment I haven't the hardware at hand for testing.
Thanks for the feedback!
What about the danger of regressions or effects on non-SMP
debugging?
(I haven't an
> Looks a good patch to me. Bringing SMP support on OpenOCD is very good!
> Unfortunately at the moment I haven't the hardware at hand for testing.
Thanks for the feedback!
What about the danger of regressions or effects on non-SMP
debugging?
(I haven't analyzed the patch much yet.)
Seeing that
On 19/04/2011 10.11, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Michel,
thanks for the effort here!
Could you write some documentation?
I'd like to let these patches cool off and leave some time for feedback.
Looks a good patch to me. Bringing SMP support on OpenOCD is very good!
Unfortunately at the moment I
