--- On Mon, 7/12/10, Spencer Oliver wrote:
>
> The newer versions of the luminary boards have
> replaced the cpld with
> logic aswell, have a look at the new 811 user guide.
No; the 811 was always discrete. Not all boards
used CPLDs, just a few. I don't think they've
ever changed from CPLD
On 12/07/2010 11:59, David Brownell wrote:
Is there any schematics available for
this adapter?
Yes, lm3s3748-ek. See the user's guide. This
is one that uses a small CPLD external to the
ft2232 chip. So the schematics include just a
bit of tracing through CPLD logic...
The newer version
--- On Mon, 7/12/10, Spencer Oliver wrote:
>
> Just for info rowley in the uk produce a swd
> adapter for ftdi based dongles.
> I have one here and it works very well with their software.
Maybe it could start working with ours at
some point too ... ;)
>
> http://sites.fastspring.com/rowley/p
> From STM32 & ZY1000 using current
> master branch:
Looks OK to me. Maybe a bit thinner than
the other ROM tables I'm used to seeing,
but that could just be STM32 vs fancier
chips (OMAP3, LPC1768, etc).
Thanks -- this suggests maybe I was on the
right track to think of layout bug in luminary.
> Is there any schematics available for
> this adapter?
Yes, lm3s3748-ek. See the user's guide. This
is one that uses a small CPLD external to the
ft2232 chip. So the schematics include just a
bit of tracing through CPLD logic...
> I've placed an order for one to have a look
Somehow I
Is there any schematics available for this adapter?
I've placed an order for one to have a look
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
From STM32 & ZY1000 using current master branch:
> dap info 0
AP ID register 0x14770011
Type is MEM-AP AHB
AP BASE 0xe00ff003
Valid ROM table present
MEMTYPE system memory present on bus
ROMTABLE[0x0] = 0xfff0f003
Component base address 0xe000e000, s
On 11/07/2010 09:30, Michael Schwingen wrote:
On 11.07.2010 02:54, David Brownell wrote:
Not "just" -- see the schematics, you'll notice
a bunch of wiring needed to support SWD as an
option in addition to JTAG.Some SWD signals are
bidirectional, so a pure JTAG adapter is
not going to handle SWD
