> On top of that, I've got the following more substantive change.
> It should get rid of one regression ... comments? I'm inclined
> to just check it in. Does anyone really need to support debug
> hosts that aren't using ELF and GNU AS?
I'd say commit. Looks good. You update TODO though there
is
I would like to see reset_config's in the target config
scripts so that the target config scripts are useful
standalone against PCBs that use the part in unclever
ways.
The only nasty side effect of this is that the board
config script has to be kept in sync with changes
in the target config scrip
I finally got a libc working with everything build from source on 64b.
I used openembedded to make gcc. Then added in newlib. You need the
libelf from Ubuntu 9.10 in order to compile. I still have a couple of
minor issues with exceptions from div0.
Now, the downside. Contiki linked in 40KB of run
I just committed some xscale updates; mostly cleanups that
change no behavior at all, but some minor bugfixes too (only
one of which, modifying R0 state but attributing it to R15/PC,
is likely to have been observed). See the git history for
details ... or let me know if you really want to see such
On Sunday 11 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> >> I've got some more complicated patches to come so pointers to how to
> >> make patches that make your life easy are welcome.
> >
> > Start with "git diff"...
> >
> > It'd be nice if we could get to the point where patches sent
> > to the mailing
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:15 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 10 October 2009, Wookey wrote:
>> +++ Øyvind Harboe [2009-10-10 09:10 +0200]:
>> > I've committed your changes + tried to clean up
>> > the CPUTAPID stuff a little bit. Not pretty, but I'll post
>> > something separate about tha
