Re: [Openocd-development] Cortex-A8, Introduction

2009-09-06 Thread Matt Hsu
Magnus Lundin wrote: > Hello list. > > For those of you who has not yet had the time to read all the TRM's > covering Cortex-A8 and ARM ADIv5, I have started to write up an easy > introduction to the debug components in a Cortex-A8 system. > It's great. The first look on Cortex-A8 debug sy

[Openocd-development] Cortex-A8, Introduction

2009-09-06 Thread Magnus Lundin
Hello list. For those of you who has not yet had the time to read all the TRM's covering Cortex-A8 and ARM ADIv5, I have started to write up an easy introduction to the debug components in a Cortex-A8 system. This is not intended to replace the TRM's but to help the casual reader gain an under

Re: [Openocd-development] Beagleboard extra clocks in reset

2009-09-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
So what happens when you modify the code to use runidle instead of jtag_add_extraclocks()? If that works, then it's a good indication that we should move to implement events here and that the event sites have been identified correctly. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting

Re: [Openocd-development] Beagleboard extra clocks in reset

2009-09-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 06 September 2009, Dirk Behme wrote: >> This was the first start of OpenOCD after cold reset of the board. > > Yours acted more politely than mine... > > >> Yes, with some further re-starts of OpenOCD without board reset, it >> behav

Re: [Openocd-development] Beagleboard extra clocks in reset

2009-09-06 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 06 September 2009, Dirk Behme wrote: > This was the first start of OpenOCD after cold reset of the board. Yours acted more politely than mine... > Yes, with some further re-starts of OpenOCD without board reset, it > behaves different. I can't say if this happens with your tck100.pat

Re: [Openocd-development] Beagleboard extra clocks in reset

2009-09-06 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Holger Freyther wrote: > On Friday 04 September 2009 21:39:08 Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> > Shouldn't it do that when TRST is released instead of when >> > it's asserted? >> >> Fixed in take #2. >> >> Testing anyone? > > Yes, can you tell me how the expected result looks

Re: [Openocd-development] new lpc2xxx cfg files layout

2009-09-06 Thread Audrius Urmanavičius
Yes this is nice idea; it also helps keeping track on changes (one does not need to reflect possible config modifications to a bunch of similar files). I just wanted to remind that LPC17xx series also falls under LPC2xxx group in OpenOCD. The differences are VARIANT=lpc1700, RAM (i.e. work-area-phy

Re: [Openocd-development] Beagleboard extra clocks in reset

2009-09-06 Thread Dirk Behme
David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 05 September 2009, David Brownell wrote: >> ... see the appended patch, which >> is yours plus (a) "quilt" removed spurious end-of-line >> whitespace, and (b) the icepic.cfg update is there > > Doesn't behave quite right ... I got ... RCLK - adaptive extra clo

Re: [Openocd-development] Beagleboard extra clocks in reset

2009-09-06 Thread David Brownell
On Saturday 05 September 2009, David Brownell wrote: > ... see the appended patch, which > is yours plus (a) "quilt" removed spurious end-of-line > whitespace, and (b) the icepic.cfg update is there Doesn't behave quite right ... Open On-Chip Debugger 0.3.0-in-development (2009-09-05-19:21) svn:e