Little-endian mode. I can correctly access the ARM11 core via MAJIC JTAG
interface and Mentor's software. Only Olimex/openocd is giving me
trouble with 16-bit access.
I tried to configure openocd with big-endian but I get the same results
(32bit & 8bit work, 16bit return always 0x)
Attached
michal smulski wrote:
> I am using C100 (Mindspeed ARM11 dual core). I can correctly access
> DDR2 and 16 bit flash on it via 8-bit and 32-bit commands (mdb,mdw) but
> not 16-bit access.
Are you running it in big or little endian mode?
I did some work on that CPU some time ago, and ran into probl
I am using C100 (Mindspeed ARM11 dual core). I can correctly access
DDR2 and 16 bit flash on it via 8-bit and 32-bit commands (mdb,mdw) but
not 16-bit access.
I discovered this by trying to do 'flash probe 0' and it returned 0. I
then looked through code and noticed that flash control/info is ac
Nico Coesel pisze:
> Did you try to relax the MAM timing (more waitstates)? The errate sheet
> does mention some problems with the MAM without a work around. I don't
> know if switching off the MAM is something that you want. This slows the
> device down considerably so you are not debugging the so
I take it back... I see it now. I might have been preoccupied by this
thinking that LPC210[123] and LPC210[456] are almost the same except for the
RAM size and I was wrong.
Sorry for my last email.
-Ananda
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Ananda Regmi wrote:
> No it is not..
>
> LPC2103 is clea
No it is not..
LPC2103 is clearly listed as lpc2000_v1. See
lpc2000_v1 (older LPC21xx and LPC22xx)
When I use lpc2000_v1 and through telnet use command *flash info 0*, I get
the following which I think a proper representation of LPC2106 flash. I say
so because while loading through serial port us
2009/8/3 Michael Jäntsch :
> 1. This issue has been around for some time in the svn. Some people
> have reported it but it hasn't really been fixed. When making
> openocd there is an error in finally linking openocd.
> With release v0.2 I do the following on my Ubuntu 9.04 machine:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
> development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Freddie Chopin
> Sent: zaterdag 18 juli 2009 16:07
> To: openocd-development
> Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Strange problem with LPC2103
>
>
hello, everybody
Who can give me a FT2232 manual.
I just study the FT2232 interface.
thank you very much.
best regards
wangqiang
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd
ok,I will try.
I use the fd2232d now.
On 8/3/09, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Qiang Wang wrote:
>> thank you very much.
>> Can openocd support the FT2232H？
>
> Yes it is supported. I do not have access to FT2232H based debugger though.
>
> --
> Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogsp
Hello everyone,
I've been using openocd from the svn for a while now. Really great
project!!!
But I do have some trouble with release v0.2 that might be interesting
for you guys.
1. This issue has been around for some time in the svn. Some people
have reported it but it hasn't really b
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Qiang Wang wrote:
> thank you very much.
> Can openocd support the FT2232H？
Yes it is supported. I do not have access to FT2232H based debugger though.
--
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
___
Openocd-development mailing
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Qiang Wang wrote:
> hello, everybody
> Who can give me a FT2232 manual.
> I just study the FT2232 interface.
>
FT2232C/FT2232D
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/FT2232C.htm
FT2232H
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/FT2232H.htm
--
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
_
thank you very much.
Can openocd support the FT2232H？
On 8/3/09, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Qiang Wang wrote:
>> hello, everybody
>> Who can give me a FT2232 manual.
>> I just study the FT2232 interface.
>>
> FT2232C/FT2232D
> http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/FT2232C
> Of course, the speed of OpenOCD can be improved.
> But I think sometimes it is really you get what you
> pay for...
Yes,I know. But I believe that technology can achieve it.
The big stuffs are too expensive.They do not worth its price.
I want to improve the openocd performance.
I will try to r
15 matches
Mail list logo
