On Apr 12, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Rick Altherr
wrote:
On Apr 11, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
- Changing JTAG state transitions to use shortest path rather
than 7
clocks
- Fixing all the drivers that assumed 7 clocks per transi
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Rick Altherr wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>
>>> - Changing JTAG state transitions to use shortest path rather than 7
>>> clocks
>>> - Fixing all the drivers that assumed 7 clocks per transition
>>
>> Why would you want to change thi
On Apr 12, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Rick Altherr wrote:
...
it looks like the following major projects are in progress:
...
- Cortex-A8 support
... has had some initial discovery but no real development.
Yes, I agree.
I'd really like to help with Cortex-A8 support. But I have
On Apr 11, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
- Changing JTAG state transitions to use shortest path rather than
7 clocks
- Fixing all the drivers that assumed 7 clocks per transition
Why would you want to change this? We've got pathmove for those cases
where the path matters...?
Pe
I have compiled one of the latest version (svn:1454) compiled.
The device AT91SAM9260 is not initialised correctly.
Error: JTAG communication failure, check connection, JTAG interface,target
power etc.
Error: trying to validate configured JTAG chain anyway...
Error: Could not validate JTAG scan
Rick Altherr wrote:
...
> it looks like the
> following major projects are in progress:
>
...
> - Cortex-A8 support
>
> ... has had
> some initial discovery but no real development.
Yes, I agree.
I'd really like to help with Cortex-A8 support. But I have to admit
that I don't understand a lo
