Including Jordan Brown who is the person that has been replying previously.
This is a merger of both previous responses from Aaron and Howard.
Doug.
On 06/23/15 09:37, Howard Chu wrote:
On 06/23/15 08:56, Aaron Richton wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Doug Leavitt wrote:
[...]
The code change it
X509_V_FLAG_PARTIAL_CHAIN support
in OpenLDAP libldap, assuming it exists in the version of OpenSSL being use to
build
OpenLDAP.
What's the use case? It appears that the feature has been in OpenSSL since
around 2012, but I don't see much documentation or chatter about it. Why is
it useful, and do
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Doug Leavitt wrote:
[...]
The code change itself is simple. At a minimum it is as simple as adding:
#ifdef X509_V_FLAG_PARTIAL_CHAIN
Perhaps with a doc patch too, since this would make OpenLDAP one of
(apparently very) few OpenSSL-linked applications that honors partial
support
in OpenLDAP libldap, assuming it exists in the version of OpenSSL
being use to
build
OpenLDAP.
What's the use case? It appears that the feature has been in OpenSSL
since around 2012, but I don't see much documentation or chatter about
it. Why is it useful, and do GnuTLS and MozN
Doug Leavitt wrote:
Hi,
OpenSSL now has X509_V_FLAG_PARTIAL_CHAIN support in the code base as of 1.0.2a.
I would like to submit a patch to enable X509_V_FLAG_PARTIAL_CHAIN support
in OpenLDAP libldap, assuming it exists in the version of OpenSSL being use to
build
OpenLDAP.
What's th
Hi,
OpenSSL now has X509_V_FLAG_PARTIAL_CHAIN support in the code base as of
1.0.2a.
I would like to submit a patch to enable X509_V_FLAG_PARTIAL_CHAIN support
in OpenLDAP libldap, assuming it exists in the version of OpenSSL being
use to build
OpenLDAP.
Before I submit any patch I would
