Re: Issues ISC dhcpd using libldap of OpenLDAP 2.4.48

2019-07-17 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 8:19 PM +0200 Michael Ströder wrote: On 7/17/19 4:41 PM, Howard Chu wrote: strace is not useful here. Pretty sure we've stated this many times before. Sorry. Indeed ltrace output is more helpful. Hm, does reverting any of these four ITSes allow it to work?

Re: Issues ISC dhcpd using libldap of OpenLDAP 2.4.48

2019-07-17 Thread Howard Chu
Michael Ströder wrote: > On 7/17/19 4:41 PM, Howard Chu wrote: >> strace is not useful here. Pretty sure we've stated this many times before. > > Sorry. Indeed ltrace output is more helpful. > > Here's the test with 2.4.48: > >

Re: Issues ISC dhcpd using libldap of OpenLDAP 2.4.48

2019-07-17 Thread Michael Ströder
On 7/17/19 4:41 PM, Howard Chu wrote: > strace is not useful here. Pretty sure we've stated this many times before. Sorry. Indeed ltrace output is more helpful. Here's the test with 2.4.48: 27337 ldap_initialize

Re: Issues ISC dhcpd using libldap of OpenLDAP 2.4.48

2019-07-17 Thread Howard Chu
Michael Ströder wrote: > HI! > > I've tried the following without success: > > Disabled Link Time Optimization (LTO), recently introduced for openSUSE > Tumbleweed, in packages openldap2 and dhcp-server. Just to make sure it > does not cause any harm. > > Upstream update to dhcp 4.4.1 without an