2006/12/14, Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is a pointless exercise.
> --On Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:27 PM +0800 "石斌(Seuler.shi)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dear Quanah:
>>
>> Because the replication features provided by OpenLDAP do
not
>> meet our software requireme
石斌(Seuler.shi) wrote:
I just solve the problem and the BDB replication can work well with the
OpenLDAP.
The back-bdb caching mechanism is not removed. I will test the
performance while
deploying back-bdb configuration in OpenLDAP.
Have fun testing. You're getting well ahead of yourself; fir
--On Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:58 PM +0800 "石斌(Seuler.shi)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have solved the problem just now. The BDB replication can work well
with OpenLDAP.
I doubt that it really does. In any case, if you want to discuss this,
keep it to openldap-devel and not my add
This is a pointless exercise.
--On Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:27 PM +0800 "石斌(Seuler.shi)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Quanah:
Because the replication features provided by OpenLDAP do not
meet our software requirement.
If there are N slaves and 1 master in a re
--On Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:27 PM +0800 "石斌(Seuler.shi)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Quanah:
Because the replication features provided by OpenLDAP do not
meet our software requirement.
If there are N slaves and 1 master in a replication group in
BDB, once
