--On Thursday, June 14, 2018 10:44 PM +0100 Howard Chu
wrote:
For back-ldap:
idle-timeout -> The man page says takes an integer, but is defined as a
string. However, I think the man page for this parameter is incorrect,
and in fact it takes a possible string as defined in the
back-meta/asy
On 06/14/2018 11:58 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> On 06/14/2018 10:44 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
idle-timeout -> The man page says takes an integer, but is defined as
a string. However, I think the man page for this parameter is
incorrec
Michael Ströder wrote:
On 06/14/2018 10:44 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
idle-timeout -> The man page says takes an integer, but is defined as
a string. However, I think the man page for this parameter is
incorrect, and in fact it takes a possible string as defined in the
ba
On 06/14/2018 10:44 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> idle-timeout -> The man page says takes an integer, but is defined as
>> a string. However, I think the man page for this parameter is
>> incorrect, and in fact it takes a possible string as defined in the
>> back-meta/async
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
There are three options between back-ldap, back-meta, and back-asyncmeta that
seem to have an incorrect defintion for cn=config and/or a documentation bug.
For back-ldap:
idle-timeout -> The man page says takes an integer, but is defined as a
string. However, I thi
There are three options between back-ldap, back-meta, and back-asyncmeta
that seem to have an incorrect defintion for cn=config and/or a
documentation bug.
For back-ldap:
idle-timeout -> The man page says takes an integer, but is defined as a
string. However, I think the man page for this pa
