--On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 5:07 PM +0300 Aapo Romu
wrote:
Hello, Howard
I'm sorry that it took so long to respond but we needed to figure out how
we will arrange this.
So we are going to take a look at the back-sql tickets together with Eetu
next Friday and start working from there
Hello, Howard
I'm sorry that it took so long to respond but we needed to figure out how
we will arrange this.
So we are going to take a look at the back-sql tickets together with Eetu
next Friday and start working from there. At some point (probably at the
start of September) a third person will
Hello, Howard and thank you for your offer of the maintainer role of
back-sql. What kind of effort / how much work does maintaining an
OpenLDAP backend module between releases usually take?
Eficode as a company is absolutely interested in supporting OpenLDAP
development efforts and we started seek
Aapo Romu wrote:
> Hello, Howard and thank you for your offer of the maintainer role of
> back-sql. What kind of effort / how much work does maintaining an OpenLDAP
> backend module between releases usually take?
The intensity of effort is up to you. There are currently 26 tickets in the ITS
fo
Aapo Romu wrote:
> We are heavily utilising back-sql on our product. Granted it has its issues
> but it does so far fulfill our needs. We are currently running on 2.4.58
> which we
> build ourselves for Debian and RHEL/CentOS based systems. We needed couple of
> patches to back-sql to make it wo
We are heavily utilising back-sql on our product. Granted it has its issues
but it does so far fulfill our needs. We are currently running on 2.4.58
which we build ourselves for Debian and RHEL/CentOS based systems. We
needed couple of patches to back-sql to make it work for us. I just created
issu
--On Sunday, August 8, 2021 6:32 PM +0100 Howard Chu wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
For 2.5, we deprecated:
back-ndb
back-sql
back-perl
Should these be removed for 2.6?
I still routinely build back-perl in master. Is there any reason to
remove it?
Not necessarily, that's why I star
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
For 2.5, we deprecated:
back-ndb
back-sql
back-perl
Should these be removed for 2.6?
I still routinely build back-perl in master. Is there any reason to remove it?
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun ht
For 2.5, we deprecated:
back-ndb
back-sql
back-perl
Should these be removed for 2.6?
Additionally, I think we should be deleting retired backends out of master.
Git is designed for this type of thing, there's no need for them to persist
(For example, back-shell). It makes branching new relea
