--On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 8:19 PM +0200 Michael Ströder
wrote:
On 7/17/19 4:41 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
strace is not useful here. Pretty sure we've stated this many times
before.
Sorry. Indeed ltrace output is more helpful.
Hm, does reverting any of these four ITSes allow it to work?
Michael Ströder wrote:
> On 7/17/19 4:41 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
>> strace is not useful here. Pretty sure we've stated this many times before.
>
> Sorry. Indeed ltrace output is more helpful.
>
> H
On 7/17/19 4:41 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
> strace is not useful here. Pretty sure we've stated this many times before.
Sorry. Indeed ltrace output is more helpful.
Here's the test with 2.4.48:
-
Michael Ströder wrote:
> HI!
>
> I've tried the following without success:
>
> Disabled Link Time Optimization (LTO), recently introduced for openSUSE
> Tumbleweed, in packages openldap2 and dhcp-server. Just to make sure it
> does not cause any harm.
>
> Upstream update to dhcp 4.4.1 without an
HI!
I've tried the following without success:
Disabled Link Time Optimization (LTO), recently introduced for openSUSE
Tumbleweed, in packages openldap2 and dhcp-server. Just to make sure it
does not cause any harm.
Upstream update to dhcp 4.4.1 without any of openSUSE's back-port patches.
dhcpd
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:34:44AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Ondrej is looking at a few different issues related to replication w/
> syncrepl, including cn=config. Additionally, the fix applied for ITS#8427
> has broken back-ldap with ldaps.
>
> For the last item, one option would be to
Ondrej is looking at a few different issues related to replication w/
syncrepl, including cn=config. Additionally, the fix applied for ITS#8427
has broken back-ldap with ldaps.
For the last item, one option would be to revert ITS#8427, although I'd
prefer to see a fix rather than a revert.
Am Dienstag, den 25.06.2019, 15:24 -0700 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
[...]
> I've run the test 2,000 times with zero failures. If you still have the
> testrun directory available from this failed run, it may be worthwhile to
> examine the slapd log file, etc, to see what it reported.
The issue
--On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 9:30 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
--On Monday, June 24, 2019 9:33 AM +0200 Armin Tüting
wrote:
Starting test065-proxyauthz for mdb...
Starting master slapd on TCP/IP port 9011...
Using ldapsearch to check that master slapd is running...
Using ldapadd to p
--On Monday, June 24, 2019 9:33 AM +0200 Armin Tüting
wrote:
Starting test065-proxyauthz for mdb...
Starting master slapd on TCP/IP port 9011...
Using ldapsearch to check that master slapd is running...
Using ldapadd to populate the master directory...
Starting proxy cache on TCP/IP port 9012
--On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 5:16 PM +0200 Michael Ströder
wrote:
Any idea how I could find out what's going wrong? dhcpd seems to
dynamically link libldap 2.4.48 but fails to properly use it.
Can you step through it with something like gdb? Looking at the CHANGES
file, I don&
Le 25/06/2019 à 14:24, Clément OUDOT a écrit :
> Le 25/06/2019 à 14:18, Clément OUDOT a écrit :
>> Le 24/06/2019 à 18:10, Clément OUDOT a écrit :
>>> Le 21/06/2019 à 15:19, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>>>> This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, June 21, 2019 3:56 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> wrote:
>
>> --On Friday, June 21, 2019 7:19 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
>>&g
On 6/25/19 4:10 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> For my understanding: Does 2.4.48 require applications linked to libldap
>> to be rebuilt or is it ABI compatible?
>
> There should be no ABI changes.
Thanks for the confirmation.
>> But dhcpd (using
R which uses a combination of many different
>>> overlays. For now it seems to work just fine.
>>
>> Thanks for the extended testing Michael!
>
> For my understanding: Does 2.4.48 require applications linked to libldap
> to be rebuilt or is it ABI compatible?
There sho
;> overlays. For now it seems to work just fine.
>
> Thanks for the extended testing Michael!
For my understanding: Does 2.4.48 require applications linked to libldap
to be rebuilt or is it ABI compatible?
In most of my tests I can use 2.4.48 as binary drop-in replacement for
2.4.47.
Le 25/06/2019 à 14:18, Clément OUDOT a écrit :
> Le 24/06/2019 à 18:10, Clément OUDOT a écrit :
>> Le 21/06/2019 à 15:19, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>>> This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
>>> anticipated release, depending on f
Le 24/06/2019 à 18:10, Clément OUDOT a écrit :
> Le 21/06/2019 à 15:19, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>> This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
>> anticipated release, depending on feedback, during the week of
>> 2019/06/24.
>>
>>
Le 21/06/2019 à 15:19, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
> This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
> anticipated release, depending on feedback, during the week of
> 2019/06/24.
>
> Generally, get the code for RE24:
>
> <http://www.openlda
Am Freitag, den 21.06.2019, 06:19 -0700 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
> anticipated release, depending on feedback, during the week of 2019/06/24.
>
> Generally, get the code for RE24:
>
> <http://w
--On Saturday, June 22, 2019 11:24 AM +0200 Michael Ströder
wrote:
Furthermore I've generated RPM packages of this snapshot [1] and did
some short tests with Æ-DIR which uses a combination of many different
overlays. For now it seems to work just fine.
Thanks for the extended testing Michael
On 6/21/19 4:57 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> On 6/21/19 3:19 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
>> anticipated release, depending on feedback, during the week of 2019/06/24.
>
> make test worked just fine.
&g
--On Friday, June 21, 2019 3:56 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
--On Friday, June 21, 2019 7:19 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
anticipated release, depending on feedback, during the week of
2019/06/24.
ITS#7585
--On Friday, June 21, 2019 7:19 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
anticipated release, depending on feedback, during the week of 2019/06/24.
ITS#7585 needs a further fix for FreeBSD12, working on it.
--Quanah
On 6/21/19 3:19 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
> anticipated release, depending on feedback, during the week of 2019/06/24.
make test worked just fine.
revision ee4538080
openSUSE Tumbleweed x86_64
gcc 9.1.1
Ciao, Michael.
This is expected to be the final testing call for 2.4.48, with an
anticipated release, depending on feedback, during the week of 2019/06/24.
Generally, get the code for RE24:
<http://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;a=snapshot;h=refs/heads/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4;sf=
--On Tuesday, June 04, 2019 9:22 AM +0200 Michael Ströder
wrote:
HI!
Any blockers for releasing 2.4.48?
Ciao, Michael.
I need to circle around back on the list of items I had, I'll do that this
week. We may simply have to punt on some of them, as much as I'd rather
not. ;)
HI!
Any blockers for releasing 2.4.48?
Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
28 matches
Mail list logo
