On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 05:46, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> But my point was, I think it’s a fallacy to tie software quality and
> frequency of releases.
I encounter way too much software today that
> releases frequently, but what it releases is poorly (or not at all) QA'd,
> etc. And it's a nigh
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 06:48, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Why was this particular approach chosen? As opposed to, for example,
> doing feature releases more often (e.g. 2.6 as soon as a few months
> after 2.5), or adding a fourth version component (2.5.y.z) for strictly
> bugfix-only patch releases? Not tr
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 10:37 pm, Howard Chu wrote:
> We have a project policy of not including content we can't support. And as
> a general
> circumstance, if we don't use something ourselves, then we aren't in a
> position to support it.
> Are you going to be here for the next 20+ years to suppor
Hi Howard,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 01:59, Howard Chu wrote:
> AFAICS it is just another moving part that breaks. It doesn't provide any
> information.
> To use it you have to know whether to look in the /usr configs or /usr/local
> (or other places),
pkg-config automatically knows where the head
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 21:59, Howard Chu wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > Howard, what's your opinion/thought on adding this for master/RE25? Ryan
> > tested it and it worked for him.
>
> My personal opinion is that pkg-config is garbage and in all my experience it
> has
> only ever preve
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 11:02 pm, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Hi Quanah,
>
> On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 03:32, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> > A few commits stacking up, so would like to review them for inclusion in
> an
> > eventual 2.4.49.
>
> Any chance that ITS#8
Hi Quanah,
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 03:32, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
> A few commits stacking up, so would like to review them for inclusion in an
> eventual 2.4.49.
Any chance that ITS#8996 could be included? Back in April, you said
pkg-config support would need to wait for a 2.5 release [1], bu
Hi Ondřej,
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 23:38, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I've prepared a plan what the project wants to achieve as part of the
> 2.5 stream apart from core OpenLDAP development that I intend to send to
> -technical for wider discussion and as a call for participation.
Two months ha
Hi Quanah,
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 8:26 am, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> As it is a feature request and not a bug fix, it may be a while as we're
> currently working on getting the OpenLDAP 2.4 series (feature frozen)
> wrapped up. At that point we can spend a bit more time on planning what
> ope
Hi,
I submitted #8996 [1] a month ago. I'm just wondering how long it will
stay in Incoming before being reviewed and/or processed.
Thank you,
Hugh
[1] http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Incoming?id=8996;page=29
10 matches
Mail list logo
